July 30, 2004
Ain't That Peculiar, Baby?
There were reports not so long ago that Bushco was pressuring Pakistan to capture major terrorist figures before the election, and especially on July 27, 28, and 29. And now this report:Embassy bombings figure captured in Pakistan
A major al-Qaeda operative, who had a $25 million bounty on his head for his alleged role in the 1998 bombings at U.S. embassies in East Africa, has been captured by Pakistani authorities, federal law enforcement and intelligence officials said Thursday.Peculiar as can be. (Hey, it's not my fault my life comes with a soundtrack. Blame my mother. Or Rock and Roll. Or FDR. I don't care.)
Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, one of the FBI's 22 most wanted terrorists, was arrested in central Pakistan with about a dozen other terror suspects on Sunday, said the officials who asked not to be identified because of the ongoing investigation.
posted
7:30 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 29, 2004
I don't know what Drum actually posted, and I'm not sure I care. He worries me. Here is all of Article 3, Section 2:
It seems odd to me that it has taken over 200 years for Congress to claim that it can restrict the court in this way. It seem stranger to me that our vaunted "free," "liberal" press is not talking to a bunch of people who are Constitutional scholars. I think a lot of us would be very interested.
If, somehow, this idiocy does stand up, then it's time to change the Constitution, and fast. Don't kid yourself for a second that this is about Gay marriage or Gay rights. This is about everybody's rights. What if the Congress had forbidden the Court to rule in Brown vs. Board of Education? Jose Padilla (as in, kiss habeas corpus goodbye)? Habeas corpus only goes back to at least 1679. But pick any right for anyone. All of a sudden all our rights will be subject to the whims of a majority of the lechislature where, as we know, the biggest lechers are Repukes. And why not? It's easy to be a lecher when you flat don't give a shit about other people.
July 29, 2004
More on Repukes Gutting Constitution
Dum Luks posted the following in the comments section regarding the Repukelican House o' Reps attempt to destroy the independent judiciary and all rights for everybody.Kevin Drum gives the constitution quote which may be interpreted to give congress the power to make 'exceptions' to the judiciary's power.
-- ml
Article 3, Section 2 of the United States constitution outlines the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court:
....In all the other Cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
I don't know what Drum actually posted, and I'm not sure I care. He worries me. Here is all of Article 3, Section 2:
Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.Now, II read that as, in part, in all cases where a state is a party, the Supremes have original jurisdiction. I see nowhere where the Congress is given the right to make exceptions or regulations regarding original jurisdiction.
In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.
The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.
It seems odd to me that it has taken over 200 years for Congress to claim that it can restrict the court in this way. It seem stranger to me that our vaunted "free," "liberal" press is not talking to a bunch of people who are Constitutional scholars. I think a lot of us would be very interested.
If, somehow, this idiocy does stand up, then it's time to change the Constitution, and fast. Don't kid yourself for a second that this is about Gay marriage or Gay rights. This is about everybody's rights. What if the Congress had forbidden the Court to rule in Brown vs. Board of Education? Jose Padilla (as in, kiss habeas corpus goodbye)? Habeas corpus only goes back to at least 1679. But pick any right for anyone. All of a sudden all our rights will be subject to the whims of a majority of the lechislature where, as we know, the biggest lechers are Repukes. And why not? It's easy to be a lecher when you flat don't give a shit about other people.
posted
1:42 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 25, 2004
July 25, 2004
Be All The Guinea Pig You Can Be
Report: Bigger breasts offered as perk to soldiersNEW YORK (Reuters) -- The U.S. Army has long lured recruits with the slogan "Be All You Can Be," but now soldiers and their families can receive plastic surgery, including breast enlargements, on the taxpayers' dime.That's quite a perk - if you're dumb enough to let a military doctor do elective surgery on you. My wife has a scar on her belly 12 inches long and an inch wide, and it's jagged. An Air Force surgeon cut her for some female plumbing problem. Army doctors are thought to be worse than Army cooks. The cooks kill only a very few soldiers. The doctors not only kill more, they mutilate the rest. And think about this:
The magazine quoted an Army spokeswoman as saying, "the surgeons have to have someone to practice on."
posted
11:27 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
by Gerald Plessner
Plessner says we need a new term to describe Republicans because they're obviously not conservative any more. I agree. He suggests the term orthodox. Orthodox what I'm not sure, except in the case of Republican Libertarians, who he would call orthodox Libertarians. I disagree. I like to call them radicals, but in the cases of far right Republicans, the neocons and Bushco, I prefer a stronger term. Fascists. I wouldn't put Libertarians, or libertarians, in that category though. Having read a fair amount about libertarianism, and about as much Ayn Rand as any normal person can stomach, I'm inclined to put Libertarians in a different category. Damn fools. (Hate mail welcomed.)
You don't do the right thing by following the right rules. You do the right thing by looking at each situation and figuring out the most effective way to do the right thing. Rigid rules are a hindrance, not the road to salvation. At any rate, Plessner is right that Republicans aren't conservatives anymore, and they haven't been for a long time. Maybe there's a way to lump them all into one category. How about dickheads?
Good Question
What ever happened to conservative Republicans?by Gerald Plessner
Plessner says we need a new term to describe Republicans because they're obviously not conservative any more. I agree. He suggests the term orthodox. Orthodox what I'm not sure, except in the case of Republican Libertarians, who he would call orthodox Libertarians. I disagree. I like to call them radicals, but in the cases of far right Republicans, the neocons and Bushco, I prefer a stronger term. Fascists. I wouldn't put Libertarians, or libertarians, in that category though. Having read a fair amount about libertarianism, and about as much Ayn Rand as any normal person can stomach, I'm inclined to put Libertarians in a different category. Damn fools. (Hate mail welcomed.)
You don't do the right thing by following the right rules. You do the right thing by looking at each situation and figuring out the most effective way to do the right thing. Rigid rules are a hindrance, not the road to salvation. At any rate, Plessner is right that Republicans aren't conservatives anymore, and they haven't been for a long time. Maybe there's a way to lump them all into one category. How about dickheads?
posted
9:45 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 23, 2004
Hysteria, race, and reality, from Orcinus.
My only intention is to call evil motherfuckers evil motherfuckers, and, if they dare to attack the decent folks, do all in my power to kick their nasty asses. To paraphrase Sonny Boy Williamson II, motherfuck the motherfuckin' "conservatives." And when I write "conservatives," I mean right wing, fascist, little Dick Cheney heads.
July 23, 2004
Why I Hate "Conservatives"
Because they're evil rat bastards, that's why. Decent people don't sign on to this sort of bullshit.Hysteria, race, and reality, from Orcinus.
The [Seattle] Times also ran columns by noted conservative Henry McLemore, who frequently attacked the presence of Japanese descendants on the West Coast. In one column, headlined, "This Is War! Stop Worrying About Hurting Jap Feelings," McLemore fulminated: "...I am for the immediate removal of every Japanese on the West Coast to a point deep in the interior. I don't mean a nice part of the interior, either. Herd 'em up, pack 'em off and give 'em the inside room of the badlands. Let 'em be pinched, hurt, hungry and dead up against it. ... Personally, I hate the Japanese. And that goes for all of them."Nowadays, it's Muslims instead, but they were evil motherfuckers then, and they're evil motherfuckers now. They use "pragmatism" as an excuse for the racist bile. Fuck "conservatives." I have no intention of trying to reason with such people. They're not reasonable people. What would be the point?
My only intention is to call evil motherfuckers evil motherfuckers, and, if they dare to attack the decent folks, do all in my power to kick their nasty asses. To paraphrase Sonny Boy Williamson II, motherfuck the motherfuckin' "conservatives." And when I write "conservatives," I mean right wing, fascist, little Dick Cheney heads.
posted
2:32 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Bush Urges Blacks Not to Back Democrats
Bush Panders To Blacks
Actually I think he's pandering to whites who don't want to think they belong to a racist party. He's gotta know he ain't gonna swing a significant number of black votes.Bush Urges Blacks Not to Back Democrats
The president suggested perhaps the Democratic Party had started taking black voters for granted.Did Dems earn it? No. Do they deserve it? No. But its Dems or Repukes, and most blacks would have to be crazy to vote GOP. But check this:
"I know plenty of politicians assume they have your vote," he said. "But did they earn it, and do they deserve it?"
[Bush] did not mention his opposition to affirmative action in a case that touched off opposition in Michigan and nationwide.In other words, affirmative action in education is divisive, unfair and, worst of all, unconstitutional. But affirmative action to expand minority business ownership is perfectly OK! Good thing for Bush that his re-election chances apparently don't depend on his actually making sense. Ya know, I 'bout half-ass understand the whole mythos over logos thing, but logos hasn't taken this kind of pounding in quite some time.
In January 2003, Bush asserted that a program of racial preferences for minority applicants at the University of Michigan was "divisive, unfair and impossible to square with the Constitution." He took a position against the program in a Supreme Court case and did it on the birthday of civil rights hero Martin Luther King Jr.
Under the new initiative announced Friday, the administration will seek to expand business ownership among minorities by creating one-stop centers for business training, counseling, financing and contracting.
Bush's Commerce Department (news - web sites), Small Business Administration and other government entities will pool resources to help the Urban League's local offices help minority entrepreneurs.
posted
11:11 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 22, 2004
Cheney Urges Cap on Malpractice Awards
That would be a savings of 3.75% to 6.75%. Onliest thing is:
Hmm. Who to believe? The serial liars of Bushco, or the CBO. That's a tuffy.
July 22, 2004
Surprise! More GOP Lies.
How do you tell when the fascist wing of the GOP is lying? Their lips are moving. (That's also how you can tell when the lead singer's off key.)Cheney Urges Cap on Malpractice Awards
A report by the Department of Health and Human Services found that expenses traceable to legal liability fears contribute between $60 billion and $108 billion a year to the total $1.6 trillion health care bill. Legislation imposing a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages would result in 4 million more people receiving health insurance, according to Congress's Joint Economic Committee.
That would be a savings of 3.75% to 6.75%. Onliest thing is:
An analysis by the Congressional Budget Office said the malpractice bill would benefit physicians and the government but would reduce private health insurance premiums a scant 0.4 percent.
Hmm. Who to believe? The serial liars of Bushco, or the CBO. That's a tuffy.
"The Bush administration largely gets it backwards," said Columbia University law professor and physician William M. Sage. "They say health care is expensive because of lawsuits. I say lawsuits are expensive because of our health care system."I'm inclined to believe him, too, because Bushco always gets it wrong. WMD? Iraqis welcoming US troops? The cost of the war? How long US troops would be in Iraq? The cost of the Medicare prescription drug bill? This list could go on and on.
posted
5:50 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Their headline gets it wrong, mine gets it right. If I had more room I'd have added Removes Annoying Check/Balance That Founding Fathers Foolishly Placed in Constitution.
I'm pretty happy with lifetime appointments of independent judges who interpret the Constitution. Where I think an extra check on the judiciary should be added is in the confirmation process. It should definitely require a 2/3s vote to confirm any federal judge. That would make it far more likely that fair and moderate judges would be confirmed.
If Congress can tell the judiciary what to do, then we have no check at all, but merely a bureaucracy subordinate to Congress. In that case, kiss all your rights goodbye. Congress will be able to change them whenever they want with a mere majority vote.
House Votes to Destroy Independent Judiciary
House Votes to Curb Same-Sex MarriageTheir headline gets it wrong, mine gets it right. If I had more room I'd have added Removes Annoying Check/Balance That Founding Fathers Foolishly Placed in Constitution.
The House measure, also supported by the administration, offers a different approach. It would forbid federal judges from requiring one state to recognize a same-sex marriage licensed in another.This is not a new idea. The fascist wing of the Republican Party has pushed other bills that would end the more than two century old idea of an independent judiciary.
"I rise in defense of the Constitution, in defense of the separation of powers," said House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, a Maryland Democrat. "What's next? No judicial review of laws that restrict freedom of speech or religion?"I would love to know where in the Constitution Congress is given the power to tell the judiciary what it can and cannot rule on. I can't find it.
[snip]
Sensenbrenner said the framers of the Constitution gave Congress power to limit judicial authority.
Saying Thomas Jefferson had voiced "fears about judicial powers being unchecked," Sensenbrenner said, "This bill is a check on judicial power."
I'm pretty happy with lifetime appointments of independent judges who interpret the Constitution. Where I think an extra check on the judiciary should be added is in the confirmation process. It should definitely require a 2/3s vote to confirm any federal judge. That would make it far more likely that fair and moderate judges would be confirmed.
If Congress can tell the judiciary what to do, then we have no check at all, but merely a bureaucracy subordinate to Congress. In that case, kiss all your rights goodbye. Congress will be able to change them whenever they want with a mere majority vote.
While Democrats called the bill unprecedented, backers said Congress had moved before to limit courts' authority on matters from cleaning up hazardous waste to protecting trees.Now this shit really pisses me off. Democrats said. Backers said. How the hell hard would it be for the reporter to find out the truth of the matter and put it in the story? Nothin' but friggin' stenographers. Journalism has devolved into little more than a Satanic joke.
"If limiting the jurisdiction of the federal courts is good enough to protect trees, shouldn't it be good enough to protect a state's marriage policy?" Sensenbrenner said.
posted
5:17 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Repukes Just Love Black Folk
Report Reveals Bush Administration Has Blocked Court-Approved Payments to Black FarmersAggressive legal tactics by the Bush administration have deliberately undermined a landmark 1997 civil rights settlement with African-American farmers, turning the claims process into another chapter in a long history of discriminatory treatment by the US Department of Agriculture.Funny how this shit keeps happening to black folks at the hands of Republicans, ain't it? Cute how Ronnie Da Raygun, that wonderful man, eliminated the USDA's Office of Civil Rights. Astonishing how Repukes nevertheless whine constantly about blacks not voting Republican.
A report released today by Environmental Working Group (EWG) and the National Black Farmers Association (NBFA) finds that almost nine out of 10 black farmers have been denied compensation for discrimination over USDA crop loans, even though U.S. District Court for the District Columbia -- in approving the settlement -- had described compensation payment as "automatic." Instead the USDA, under the leadership of President Bush's Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman, has withheld three-quarters of the $2.3 billion agreed to in the settlement.
[snip]
The Reagan administration eliminated the USDA's Office of Civil Rights in 1982, leaving African-American farmers no avenue for appealing loan denials they believed to be discriminatory.
[snip]
Over the past 20 years, the number of farms operated by African-Americans has plummeted from 54,367 in 1982 to 29,090 in 2002 (the suit included 94,000 farmers because many farms have more than one farmer). This dramatic decline, the report concludes, has been due in part to lack of equal access to USDA loans.
posted
1:18 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 21, 2004
Security Remains an Issue, but U.S. Envoy Is Hopeful
So this administration feels it's OK to grant amnesty to those who've attacked Iraqis, just not to those who've attacked Americans. Because Iraqis are less human relative to Americans. Just more evidence of the evil nature of the fascist (dominant) wing of the Repukelican Party. (My comment about Islam and evil was sarcastic. My comment about the Bush fascists was not. I know you right wingers have a hard time figuring this shit out.)
NOTE: I've been fighting a computer problem the last few days and it really cut into my posting. I think I've got it mostly fixed now.
July 21, 2004
American Lives Are The Important Lives
Not long ago I posted about how some Muslims think that non-Muslims are less than human, or at least less than Muslim humans. Just more evidence of the evil nature of Islam. Uh-huh.Security Remains an Issue, but U.S. Envoy Is Hopeful
On one point, Negroponte was clear: The United States would oppose any effort by the Iraqi interim government to grant amnesty to fighters who have participated in attacks on Americans. Prime Minister Iyad Allawi has said that the government is working on a broad amnesty proposal for insurgents.
"I would take exception to that," he said when asked how he would respond if the amnesty extended to those who had attacked or killed Americans.
So this administration feels it's OK to grant amnesty to those who've attacked Iraqis, just not to those who've attacked Americans. Because Iraqis are less human relative to Americans. Just more evidence of the evil nature of the fascist (dominant) wing of the Repukelican Party. (My comment about Islam and evil was sarcastic. My comment about the Bush fascists was not. I know you right wingers have a hard time figuring this shit out.)
NOTE: I've been fighting a computer problem the last few days and it really cut into my posting. I think I've got it mostly fixed now.
posted
3:10 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 18, 2004
Bush called the film, The Grapes of Wrath, corny. Corny. I think we can fairly assume that he never read Steinbeck's book. It's the response of a man who has no idea what compassion is.
It's only one man's word, but that shoe's sure a nice fit.
July 18, 2004
Sounds Like Bush All Over
Former HBS Prof Blasts BushBush called the film, The Grapes of Wrath, corny. Corny. I think we can fairly assume that he never read Steinbeck's book. It's the response of a man who has no idea what compassion is.
Tsurumi - now a professor of international business at Baruch College in the City University of New York - said he remembers the future president as scoring in the bottom 10 percent of students in the class.
[snip]
"I always remember two groups of students," Tsurumi said then, according to published reports. "One is the really good students, not only intelligent, but with leadership qualities, courage. The other is the total opposite, unfortunately to which George belonged."
It's only one man's word, but that shoe's sure a nice fit.
posted
8:10 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Diminishing the government workforce increases the role of private contractors, and the mixed results go undebated.
Heh. Mixed results is too generous an assessment. Largely unknown results is more like it.
Nobody represents liberal (Progressive, socialist, whatever. You can call it what you want to, I call it messin' with the kid.) goals on economic issues. That's why the Dems have lost the working class. And the reason is money. Dems want to tap into that same motherlode the Repukes have: The wealthy elites. They figure they can get away with social "liberalism" as long as they don't challenge the wealthy on the issues they truly hold near and dear. That was the DLC plan, and look how well it's worked. The Dems will be lucky to ever get back in power.
People really need to hold their collective breath until Bush Bum's voluntary pollution controls kick in and people stop getting seriously sick and even dying from air pollution. Only they can't, cause they ain't never gonna kick in. Voluntary regulations are idiotic, no surprise in Bush's case. If it was something they were gonna do voluntarily anyway, no one would've suggested regulation.
And privatization is almost certainly costing us more money for less service. It sure ain't savin' us any money. So what was the point? Oh, yeah, to put more money in the pockets of the rich. It's only right. After all, they own the government.
Conservative Forces Deliver The Goods
Civil Service Has Morphed Into U.S. Inc.Diminishing the government workforce increases the role of private contractors, and the mixed results go undebated.
Heh. Mixed results is too generous an assessment. Largely unknown results is more like it.
BOSTON — For two decades, Congress has been engaged in a bipartisan effort to shrink the size of government. But today, although fewer people appear on federal payrolls, more people than ever work for the U.S. government.So, the great "conservative" push to "reduce" government has been a wild success. I'm serious. It's had exactly the results they were hoping for: a huge transfer of taxpayer money from government to the "private sector." And let's all just admit, right here, right now, the Democrats are conservatives. The Republicans are the far right.
This seeming paradox has been achieved by hiring private contractors to perform many of the tasks previously performed by federal employees. And although it may not have resulted in a true downsizing of government, it has radically transformed the way public services are provided.
Nobody represents liberal (Progressive, socialist, whatever. You can call it what you want to, I call it messin' with the kid.) goals on economic issues. That's why the Dems have lost the working class. And the reason is money. Dems want to tap into that same motherlode the Repukes have: The wealthy elites. They figure they can get away with social "liberalism" as long as they don't challenge the wealthy on the issues they truly hold near and dear. That was the DLC plan, and look how well it's worked. The Dems will be lucky to ever get back in power.
Nobody knows exactly how many contractors the government employs. Paul Light of the Brookings Institution estimates that the federal budget funds a "shadow government" of nearly 6 million contractors, about half of them in defense. That means contractors outnumber civil servants and military personnel by a ratio of 2 to 1.I'd be willing to bet that we don't get value for money. Between the profit margins demanded and the rampant fraud in government contracting, I can't see how the contractors can be more efficient from the point of view of the taxpayer.
[snip]
Second, does the taxpayer get value for money? One of the main reasons for outsourcing is that the private sector is widely assumed to be more efficient. But in Iraq, much of the $21 billion being spent on reconstruction is going to high-priced foreign contractors rather than low-cost local labor. As Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles) has pointed out, non-Iraqi contractors charged $25 million to repaint 20 police stations — a job that the governor of Basra claims could have been done by local firms for $5 million.
Finally, how should this large and growing army of workers be managed? The rules governing how and what the government buys are designed to ensure fair competition. But more than half of government contracts are awarded without full competition, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan budget analyst. Giant contractors have become adept at gaming the system. Once firms win big contracts — often using low-ball initial cost estimates — the government becomes so dependent on their services that it's almost impossible to get rid of them.This privatization idiocy coupled with the deregulation idiocy is laying waste to America. People seem to think there was never any reason for regulations or government agencies. They seem to think they were forced on unwilling voters by evil liberals like Teddy Roosevelt and FDR. They've apparently never read American history other than that they found in their approved text books. Where has deregulation helped the small consumer? Not in Pennsylvania, sure as hell not in California or the Northwest. Dennis Kucinich was practically run out of Cleveland for refusing to privatize the city electric utility. He later returned as a hero after people saw that he had absolutely done the right thing, and saved them money.
People really need to hold their collective breath until Bush Bum's voluntary pollution controls kick in and people stop getting seriously sick and even dying from air pollution. Only they can't, cause they ain't never gonna kick in. Voluntary regulations are idiotic, no surprise in Bush's case. If it was something they were gonna do voluntarily anyway, no one would've suggested regulation.
And privatization is almost certainly costing us more money for less service. It sure ain't savin' us any money. So what was the point? Oh, yeah, to put more money in the pockets of the rich. It's only right. After all, they own the government.
posted
7:12 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 17, 2004
U.S. teen birth rate hits record low in '02
The Bushies will try to make you imagine that the other stats, violence, drugs, alcohol, make a bit better case for Bush, but I don't see how. Don't programs take a while to set up and a while longer to have an effect? Has Bush even started any, or is he just promising to? I'm sure he's claimin' credit for someone else's work here.
July 17, 2004
Bush Must Be A Magician
Bush Extends Debate on Values to ChildrenDrug use and violent crime among teenagers have decreased dramatically, while children raised in households with married parents are less likely to live in poverty, the president said Saturday in his weekly radio address. He cited a newly issued government report to claim progress.And Bushy Boy's takin' credit for all this. But:
"My administration is acting to encourage teens to make healthy choices," Bush said.
[snip]
The report Friday by the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics said family life, education and health of America's children are generally improving, though child poverty has risen for the first time in a decade. Teenage smoking has declined, as have teen birth rates.
U.S. teen birth rate hits record low in '02
Twenty-three girls per 1,000, ages 15 to 17, gave birth in 2002, a decrease of 40 percent since 1991, according to the report. Births among girls ages 18 to 19 also dropped to historic lows. The largest decreases were among black teens, who once had the highest rates.So teen birth rates declined at an average of 3.33% per year from 1991 to 2002, the most recent year for which statistics are available. In 2001, they declined by 8%, which is a chunk but I don't see how Bush could have had anything to do with it. In 2002, they declined by 5.5%, also quite good, also not enough time for Bush to have anything to do with it. What, did he save our children with the sheer magic of his magnetic personality?
The Bushies will try to make you imagine that the other stats, violence, drugs, alcohol, make a bit better case for Bush, but I don't see how. Don't programs take a while to set up and a while longer to have an effect? Has Bush even started any, or is he just promising to? I'm sure he's claimin' credit for someone else's work here.
posted
4:16 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Sex pros get ready for party
Damned, Anti-Values Hollywood Liberals
Then there's them pro-family values Republicans:Sex pros get ready for party
With thousands of Republicans set to invade the city this summer, high-priced escorts and strippers are preparing for one grand old party. Agencies are flying in extra call girls from around the globe to meet the expected demand during the Aug. 30-Sept. 2 gathering at Madison Square Garden.Tip O'The Tam to Omnium.
[snip]
Clubs have started booking private parties for delegates anxious to ogle topless beauties after a day of watching fully clothed politicians boast about family values.
"We have our show down to a science," said Lonnie Hanover, a spokesman for Scores, the upscale topless club. "We'll be full every night with what we think are the best-looking girls in the industry."
posted
8:54 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
GOP's War on Workers Continues
NLRB Nixes Unions for Graduate Students, posted at From the Trenches, shows how much the Repukes and their NLRB care about basic human rights. The right of workers to organize is considered fundamental to democracy in less fascist parts of the world.
posted
7:28 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Any Lie At All -- Fox "News"
FOX guest cited phantom poll to blast NAACP and boost BushFrom the July 15 edition of FOX News Channel's Special Report with Brit Hume:
ANGLE: Let me ask you first, in your view was the president right or wrong to pass an opportunity to speak?
WOODSON: He was absolutely correct in passing this up opportunity.
[...]
WOODSON: And his [chairman of the board of the NAACP, Julian Bond] vilification of the president really does a disservice to the organization, forgetting that 83 percent of blacks no longer look to the NAACP for leadership. And I think that ...
ANGLE: Now where does that figure come?
WOODSON: Well, there are some figures -- there are some surveys done when the black community was asked.
But Media Matters For America couldn't find any such poll. They did find a different poll:On the other hand, polls show that black Americans hold the NAACP in high esteem. A 2003 poll by Black America's Political Action Committee found that 83 percent of African American registered voters view the organization favorably, compared with only 8 percent who view it unfavorably. The same poll also showed that NAACP president and CEO Kweisi Mfume is among black America's most respected leaders: 44 percent of respondents view him favorably, compared with only 6 percent who view him unfavorably.Idd'n that interesting. Right wingers're constantly claiming the NAACP doesn't represent black interests (Guess who they think does represent blacks.) and they trot out their tame, and well-paid, black conservatives to "prove" it. The guy goes on TV and cites poll results without being prepared to cite his sources.
Isn't that stupid? Not really. They know they won't get much criticism in the mainstream media and they know that good little right wing acolytes don't need proof, they just need someone who's allegedly authoritative to say something that sounds authoritative, good little fascist sheep that they are. If you haven't checked out MMFA, ya should. They look to me to be doin' yeoman's work in exposing right wing lies in the media.
posted
7:08 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
The "Liberal" Media's Double Standard
Cable coverage of Whoopi Goldberg's v. Dennis Miller's remarks: 19-2In the July 15 edition of The Washington Post, Leiby quoted Miller: "Those two cannot keep their hands off each other, can they? ... I think I have a new idea for a new campaign slogan -- use the bumper sticker 'Hey, Get A Room.' "
So Whoopi compares Bush to bush and her jokes are used to denounce both she and Kerry for going beyond the pale and she's fired by Slim-Fast.Media Matters for America reviewed FOX News Channel, MSNBC, and CNN primetime coverage of the hours between 5 pm and 11 pm on July 15, and found that the three cables addressed Whoopi Goldberg's remark a total of 19 times: three times on CNN (once on Lou Dobbs Tonight and twice on Anderson Cooper 360), three times on MSNBC (once on Deborah Norville Tonight and twice on Scarborough Country), and 13 times on the FOX News Channel (five times on The Big Story With John Gibson, three times on Special Report with Brit Hume, once on FOX Report with Shepard Smith, twice on The O'Reilly Factor, and twice on Hannity & Colmes).
In contrast, Dennis Miller's comments were addressed only twice: once on MSNBC and once on CNN. FOX News Channel never reported the story. On MSNBC's Scarborough Country, host and former U.S. Representative Joe Scarborough (R-FL) mentioned Miller as a counterexample to Goldberg, but did not address Miller's implication of a homosexual attraction between Senators Kerry and Edwards, instead focusing on Miller's jabs at other prominent Democrats. Only CNN Crossfire co-host Paul Begala, speaking on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360, brought the issue into the spotlight, saying:
BEGALA: I think it's an interesting example of the double standard in the media. Whoopi Goldberg apparently told some jokes people didn't like. I didn't hear them, don't even know what they are and everybody got their panties in a wad and here's this big corporation fires her. Meanwhile yesterday, Dennis Miller at a Bush rally basically implies that John Edwards and John Kerry are gay, then attacks my pal James Carville for the way that he looks and nobody says anything. I doubt CNN has even covered that story today at all. So why is it that a liberal comedian can make fun of President Bush, but she gets fired from her job? A conservative comedian makes really nasty sexual innuendoes about Kerry and Edwards and nobody says anything. So it's a double standard.There goes that liebrul media again. Truth is our only defense against fascist propaganda and manipulation, but will a significant number of Americans ever hear the truth again?
posted
6:18 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 16, 2004
U.S.: Patriotic Pride and Fear
July 16, 2004
How Madness Masquerades As Sanity
I'm not sure I like the title of this piece, but I sure like what it talks about.U.S.: Patriotic Pride and Fear
While some critics of US President George W Bush have charged that his administration is pursuing policies of madness, such a charge is clinically incorrect, but it may convey an extraordinarily disturbing reality. Both an eminent psychologist and a noted political scientist perceive a particularly virulent social pathogen as the basis for much of the present global strife, with Washington at the center of the epidemic.
[snip]
And noted political scientist Dr Michael Parenti told Asia Times Online that he agrees. Parenti - who received his PhD in political science from Yale and is the award-winning author of 18 books - noted that "there's a concern that we're tending towards fascism, or we're replicating fascism today". The way in which fascism is defined is key.
Parenti sees fascism as a tool employed by ruthless power elites to achieve their ends. "And what they've learned in the more than 80 years since its [fascism's] origin is that they can achieve many of these things - more securely perhaps - while retaining a democratic veneer.
"The essence of fascism, I believe, is in its output. And its output is a system which systematically redistributes wealth from the many to the few, and ensures the domination of giant cartels over the whole political economy," Parenti said. By eliminating the traditional fascist symbolism and mannerisms, by putting white gloves on it, if you will, Parenti sees the use of "plain old Americanism" as the "cloak around which people will rally and give the president these extraordinary powers, and surrender their own liberty and the like".
Ya oughta read the rest. Erich Fromm, R.D. Laing, and more get involved. I'm not sure what good it does us to know this stuff, but it is good to know that "truth is one of the strongest weapons of those who have no power."
Many thanks to commenter Jeff for the tip.
posted
11:34 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 15, 2004
The short version is they cut the shit out of the reporting staff and editors started treating reporters like drones, telling them what they would cover instead of asking them what they were working on. When five reporters on a beat are replaced by three, and three are replaced by one, sumpin's gotta give, y'all. Ya know, like spadework.
Yer on deadline and overworked, it's just a lot easier to repeat whatever the campaigns or the government spokesman are saying. Re-writing press releases is a helluva lot easier than doing in depth reporting. Pre-existing story lines save a lot of time too. Investigative reporters have all but disappeared, partly, maybe mostly, due to pressure to improve the corporate bottom line.
Add to this the PR firms working behind the scenes, the right wing think tanks and publications, and all the rest of the propaganda apparatus funded by right wing billionaires and corporations, and you can see how a reporter with very little time to check facts or dig deeper into the press release he's been handed will end up just regurgitating the right wing line.
July 15, 2004
How To "Bias" The News
One Man's Flip Is Another Man's Flop , from CJR's Campaign Desk.The Bush campaign has been remarkably successful at getting the press to buy the notion that John Kerry is a flip-flopper.And this despite the fact that it can be, and has been, thoroughly documented that Bush is the flip-flopper-in-chief. The incredible pro-Republican bias of the media can only be explained if it is the result of a giant conspiracy. Well, actually, no. You can't maintain a conspiracy that big. Campaign Desk touches on part of the explanation.
This isn't because the press is "biased" in favor of Bush. Rather, it's because the press is biased towards pre-existing storylines -- and because it allows itself to be unduly swayed by negative attacks made by the campaigns. If the GOP is more aggressive than the Democrats in drawing reporters' attention to possible instances of their opponent flip-flopping -- and they are -- then those instances will receive more press attention. Thus the press ignored Bush's about-face, both because Democrats haven't made an issue of it, and because it doesn't fit the accepted image of the president as "strong but stubborn."In other words, reporters are lazy. That ain't it either. The Columbia Journalism Review has the real story. A tale of the decline of a formerly great newspaper as written by an award winning reporter who was there. What's Become of the PROJO's Mojo? Why I Quit. If you care at all about why the media is such a mess today, read the whole story. It's a tale that's been repeated at nearly every corporate owned daily in the country.
But it would be nice if reporters did a little spadework themselves, instead of waiting for their daily bulletins from the spinners.
The short version is they cut the shit out of the reporting staff and editors started treating reporters like drones, telling them what they would cover instead of asking them what they were working on. When five reporters on a beat are replaced by three, and three are replaced by one, sumpin's gotta give, y'all. Ya know, like spadework.
Yer on deadline and overworked, it's just a lot easier to repeat whatever the campaigns or the government spokesman are saying. Re-writing press releases is a helluva lot easier than doing in depth reporting. Pre-existing story lines save a lot of time too. Investigative reporters have all but disappeared, partly, maybe mostly, due to pressure to improve the corporate bottom line.
Add to this the PR firms working behind the scenes, the right wing think tanks and publications, and all the rest of the propaganda apparatus funded by right wing billionaires and corporations, and you can see how a reporter with very little time to check facts or dig deeper into the press release he's been handed will end up just regurgitating the right wing line.
posted
11:27 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Wow! A Democratic Economic Decision.
Gas wealth fuels populist experiment in BoliviaSANTA CRUZ, BOLIVIA – For centuries, Bolivian laborers toiled to unearth silver, gold, and tin, only to see most of the wealth benefit a small number of elites and foreigners.And all it took was for the country to be so close to violent revolution by the poor that the elites are scared shitless. Kinda how things were in the US during the depression. Is that what it takes to get the people to stand up for themselves?
On Sunday, this poor landlocked Andean nation will try something novel: Voters will decide whether to nationalize the country's 55 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, the third-largest reserve in the region. It's the first time Bolivians will have been consulted on how to exploit the nation's buried assets.
posted
10:40 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Like a surprising, to me, number of people, they were Repubs because they were born Repubs. There are Dems like this too, people who seem to think their political party and their vote are determined the same way as their religion and nationality. You vote for the party you're born into. Period. But it seems Illinois is losing its religion.
Suburb shift turns state blue
Of course, much of the change is due to that social liberalism. I used to get that crap from elitest reporters all the time. "Oh, I'm socially liberal, but fiscally conservative." As if they were incapable of understanding that what they were really saying was, "It's wrong to mistreat people because of their race or sexual orientation, but fuck the poor."
Oh well. I'll take it. Not voting for Repukes is at least a step on the road.
Illinois Goes Democratic
And over, of all things, cultural issues. I used to have parents-in-law from Illinois who were rock-ribbed Republicans. You can imagine how thrilled they were with me. One time my father-in-law, a devout Catholic who never used foul language, called me the worst epithet he could think of. "Oh," he said, "you're a free thinker." I'd never heard that phrase used as a curse before.Like a surprising, to me, number of people, they were Repubs because they were born Repubs. There are Dems like this too, people who seem to think their political party and their vote are determined the same way as their religion and nationality. You vote for the party you're born into. Period. But it seems Illinois is losing its religion.
Suburb shift turns state blue
Of course, much of the change is due to that social liberalism. I used to get that crap from elitest reporters all the time. "Oh, I'm socially liberal, but fiscally conservative." As if they were incapable of understanding that what they were really saying was, "It's wrong to mistreat people because of their race or sexual orientation, but fuck the poor."
Oh well. I'll take it. Not voting for Repukes is at least a step on the road.
posted
10:23 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
I feel like every campaign from now on will start from the premise that the candidate who best distorts reality wins, and the American people will be the losers. Yeah, I know that's not completely new, but the awful level it has descended to is unprecedented, and I doubt it's ever going to crawl out again. Still, to have any chance of ever making this government serve the interests of the majority instead of the elites, we've got to prove we can move voters. This is one way to do it. Here's the link to my petition page. I've also added it to the sidebar. I hope other bloggers will use the link in Tom's email to add their blogs to the fight.
Columbine Father's Petition Drive
I am writing to you and a few other bloggers asking for help. My name is Tom Mauser and my son Daniel was killed at Columbine High School. If we don’t stand up to President Bush and the NRA right now, the assault weapons ban will expire and AK47s and Uzis will be back on our streets.Not that extending the assault weapons ban is unimportant, but the most important line in Tom Mauser's email is ". . . prove that bloggers can make a difference!" I'm a little worn down right now. The lies go on and on and on. Not just the politicians, but the media spin masters called pundits, reporters, astroturf campaigns . . . don't even get me started on TV news. TV news is to information what GW Bush is to honesty. Like Neil Young said, "Rust never sleeps." But I have to.
++++++++++
Here is what you can do to help:
1) Sign my petition to extend the assault weapon ban: http://www.tomspetition.org/blog_alert.php
When you sign up, we will automatically create a bloggable Personal Petition Page.
2) Link to your Personal Petition Page from your site and encourage your readers to sign up. Our special petition software will show you the number of people that sign up because of your effort, and even generate a map showing how the supporters are distributed across America.
++++++++++
Help honor the legacy of my son and prove that bloggers can make a difference!
Thank you,
Tom Mauser
I feel like every campaign from now on will start from the premise that the candidate who best distorts reality wins, and the American people will be the losers. Yeah, I know that's not completely new, but the awful level it has descended to is unprecedented, and I doubt it's ever going to crawl out again. Still, to have any chance of ever making this government serve the interests of the majority instead of the elites, we've got to prove we can move voters. This is one way to do it. Here's the link to my petition page. I've also added it to the sidebar. I hope other bloggers will use the link in Tom's email to add their blogs to the fight.
posted
9:38 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
I've made that argument meself and now Nathan Newman helps back me up.
Thatcherism (And Reaganism) Kills
Inequality Kills YouIn fact, inequality in status leads to higher stress for those with less power and status, so argues a new book, Status Syndrome: How Your Social Standing Directly Affects Your Health and Life Expectancy.
I've made that argument meself and now Nathan Newman helps back me up.
posted
2:04 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Bra-vo.
This Was The Right Thing To Do
Passengers Give Troops First-Class SeatsBra-vo.
posted
1:41 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 14, 2004
July 14, 2004
Any Lie At All -- The NY Post
New York Post rewrote 2000 election history Like they're the only ones.A July 12 New York Post editorial informed readers that there was no evidence Florida voters were disenfranchised in the 2000 presidential election. The paper -- owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch -- editorialized: "There is no credible evidence that a single voter was disenfranchised in 2000 for any reason whatsoever. Not one."
But a June 2001 U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report documented the widespread disenfranchisement of African American voters in Florida in the election. The report found that a disproportionate number of spoiled ballots originated from African American voters and that the misuse of felon purge lists had a similarly disproportionate impact on African American voters. The report concluded:
Accordingly, the Commission is duty bound to report, without equivocation, that the analysis presented here supports a disturbing impression that Florida's reliance on a flawed voter exclusion list, combined with the state law placing the burden of removal from the list on the voter, had the result of denying African Americans the right to vote. This analysis also shows that the chance of being placed on this list [of felons ineligible to vote] in error is greater for African Americans. Similarly, the analysis shows a direct correlation between race and having one's vote discounted as a spoiled ballot. In other words, an African American's chance of having his or her vote rejected as a spoiled ballot was significantly greater than a white voter's. Based on the evidence presented to the Commission, there is a strong basis for concluding that section 2 of the VRA [Voting Rights Act] was violated.
posted
5:29 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
It Sure Disgusts Me
Also via Brad DeLong:Matt [Yglesias] is bewildered, perhaps because he read Max Weber's Politik als Beruf at too early an age, found it convincing, and cannot conceive of people who approach politics not as a way to fight for a better world but as an arena for self-expression. If he could grasp that today's Naderite left is concerned with little other than striking an aesthetically correct oppositional stance, he would be less bewildered (but, I think, more disgusted).Just more friggin' elitists, in this case politically (or aesthetically) correct elitists. Another way to say, "I'm better than you." OK, we all have that tendency, but when that tendency leads you to assist in the destruction of America well, sorry, I can't just let it go. It's way past time for the Naderites to rejoin reality.
posted
4:28 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Did they lie or were they delusional? Ever the question, though I don't know why. It's certainly one or the other, and the one's just as bad as the other. How in the hell can anybody vote for this guy?
Giving Bushwa The Benefit Of The Doubt
From Michael Isikoff via Brad DeLong:The CIA official quickly responded: "Let's keep in mind the fact that this war's going to happen regardless of what Curve Ball said or didn't say," he wrote. "The Powers That Be probably aren't terribly interested in whether Curve Ball knows what he's talking about."The benefit of the doubt in this case amounts to, "Yeah, I believe that in the run-up to the war the Administration might have been so certain it was right that it was unwilling to hear the truth." Which hardly amounts to saying, "Oh, well that's OK, then."
Did they lie or were they delusional? Ever the question, though I don't know why. It's certainly one or the other, and the one's just as bad as the other. How in the hell can anybody vote for this guy?
posted
4:13 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 11, 2004
Unions have been severely damaged not by their own mistakes and flaws, though they certainly have flaws and have made mistakes, but by a sharp rightward turn in government that has turned labor law intended to help unions into a weapon for destruction of unions. In the last two decades unions have tried, and generally failed, to find a way around that hard reality. Now, I think the AFL-CIO may have hit on the right strategy. We have got to organize and educate people. We have got to help the Dem Party realize that they will always be the ugly stepsister to the Repukes when it comes to the wealthy elites and corporate money. Politicians want power, that's their main thing. Really, there's not much point in being a politician if you don't have power. We have got to show the Dems that we can deliver that power with large numbers of people, votes, instead of money, though we can probably come up with a fair amount of money as well.
It's all about organizing. How many of you "left-of-center" types who bash unions are doing any organizing? Every organizer I've ever met or read about, and I'm including community organizers, has been pro-union. Even in its weakened condition, the labor movement has an organizing framework from which to begin.
UPDATE: Service Employees International Union is doing the same thing with Purple Ocean.
July 11, 2004
Real Good News - Union Division
I'm sick to death of "leftists" and "progressives," who know about as much about the labor movement as your average ignorant, half-wit right winger, dumping on unions. The AFL-CIO has started a community affiliate organization, Working America, for non-union folks. From the NYT, via Nathan Newman:The A.F.L.-C.I.O. quietly began this effort last year in two cities and has expanded it to a total of 400 canvassers in 10 cities, including Cleveland, Cincinnati, St. Louis and Tampa, Fla. The aim is to enlist one million nonunion people to join the labor federation's new community affiliate, Working America. Thousands of people who have signed up have joined hands with union members to send President Bush letters and e-mail messages opposing changes in overtime rules and urging an end to tax breaks that encourage companies to send jobs overseas.Yeah buddy, way to lie your ass off. Now explain this:
"We've got about 400,000 members," said Karen Nussbaum, a longtime A.F.L.-C.I.O. official who has been named executive director of Working America. "We're adding about 20,000 members every week. It's really explosive."
[snip]
"Given their steady decline in representing workers, it's not surprising that the union movement has turned to a nontraditional way to expand its reach," said Randel Johnson, vice president for labor, immigration and employee benefits at the United States Chamber of Commerce. "Time will tell how effective this is. However, it does reinforce the reality that the traditional benefits of the union movement are no longer appealing to workers."
She said the time was opportune to create Working America, because for the first time in years opinion polls show that most Americans would like to join a union, but many are unable to do so because of intense opposition by employers.
Unions have been severely damaged not by their own mistakes and flaws, though they certainly have flaws and have made mistakes, but by a sharp rightward turn in government that has turned labor law intended to help unions into a weapon for destruction of unions. In the last two decades unions have tried, and generally failed, to find a way around that hard reality. Now, I think the AFL-CIO may have hit on the right strategy. We have got to organize and educate people. We have got to help the Dem Party realize that they will always be the ugly stepsister to the Repukes when it comes to the wealthy elites and corporate money. Politicians want power, that's their main thing. Really, there's not much point in being a politician if you don't have power. We have got to show the Dems that we can deliver that power with large numbers of people, votes, instead of money, though we can probably come up with a fair amount of money as well.
It's all about organizing. How many of you "left-of-center" types who bash unions are doing any organizing? Every organizer I've ever met or read about, and I'm including community organizers, has been pro-union. Even in its weakened condition, the labor movement has an organizing framework from which to begin.
In one of his last messages from his death row cell, Joe Hill sent a telegram to fellow Wobbly "Big Bill" Haywood. The message would emerge as a rallying cry for workers and protestors for generations to come:
"Don't waste time mourning. Organize!"
UPDATE: Service Employees International Union is doing the same thing with Purple Ocean.
posted
7:39 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Newman concludes with:
I don't have much more respect for the Democratic Party's leadership and pols than I do for Repukes. They're both tools of the wealthy elite. But I have quite a bit more respect for the Dems rank and file. The Dems can be changed for the better because of them, and the far right has provided a map for how to do it. And no, it doesn't involve voting for Nader or the Greens. Starting after the defeat of Goldwater in 1964, they worked their asses off to change the once relatively respectable Republican Party into the deranged (Supply side economics?), Confederate flag waving, NAACP snubbing Repukelican Party we know and hate today.
They did it by working from the inside, capturing county chairmanships, delegate slots, school board seats, etc. I think the same thing can be done with the Democratic Party. Republicans were moved far to the right and the Dems moved right with them, effectively moving the center much farther to the right. We can move the Dems to the left. At least, we sure as hell better try. This is a two party system, which I hate, but if it's ever gonna change, one of the major parties will have to change it. There just isn't any other way. And holding your progressive nose and voting Democratic is where it starts, but it's not where it ends.
Had Enough Horseshit Yet? A "Booming" Economy.
Nathan Newman links to a commentary by Stephen Roach, of the notoriously left wing firm Morgan Stanley. Roach argues that the jobs created in this "recovery" have skewed largely toward the low wage sectors. I know, this is supposedly still arguable. But Roach also notes:An even more dramatic picture of the quality of recent job growth emerges from the survey of households. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the count of nonfarm persons at work part time — both for economic and non-economic reasons — increased by 495,000 over the February to June 2004 interval. That amounts to an astonishing 97% of the cumulative increase of 509,000 in total nonagricultural employment as captured by the household survey over this period.Ya might wanna read that again. Fully 97% of nonagricultural jobs created were part time. Remember what the Repukelicans so desperately want to say, and in one case did say. "It's the booming economy stupid." And we supposed to say, "Thankya, massa Bush."
Newman concludes with:
This "recovery" is like no other in post-WWII history. Job growth is anemic and the jobs created generally stink. Profits are soaring, wages are stagnant, and benefits are being slashed.Hmm, what's happened since WWII? Oh, I know! I know! America's moved way far to the right.
I don't have much more respect for the Democratic Party's leadership and pols than I do for Repukes. They're both tools of the wealthy elite. But I have quite a bit more respect for the Dems rank and file. The Dems can be changed for the better because of them, and the far right has provided a map for how to do it. And no, it doesn't involve voting for Nader or the Greens. Starting after the defeat of Goldwater in 1964, they worked their asses off to change the once relatively respectable Republican Party into the deranged (Supply side economics?), Confederate flag waving, NAACP snubbing Repukelican Party we know and hate today.
They did it by working from the inside, capturing county chairmanships, delegate slots, school board seats, etc. I think the same thing can be done with the Democratic Party. Republicans were moved far to the right and the Dems moved right with them, effectively moving the center much farther to the right. We can move the Dems to the left. At least, we sure as hell better try. This is a two party system, which I hate, but if it's ever gonna change, one of the major parties will have to change it. There just isn't any other way. And holding your progressive nose and voting Democratic is where it starts, but it's not where it ends.
posted
6:43 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 10, 2004
Gay marriage will threaten civilization! Terrorism, if not utterly eliminated from existence, will destroy civilization! Britney Spears will cause the downfall of civilization! OK, that last one might be true.
What in the hell do right wingers think civilization is, a house of cards? I got news for you goofuses. Civilization ain't all that fragile. It's been around for 1,000s of years and survived a lot worse than anything facing us today, except nukes or maybe environmental disaster. And it'll take a fair number of nukes to end civilization. One here and there ain't gonna do it.
Anybody who's buying that stupid-ass argument needs to have their head examined, and soon. Opposition to gay marriage is based on nothing more than superstition, not that I'm expecting the majority of Americans to recognize that any time soon.
Uh when my right hand itches -- I gets money for sho'
But when God talks to me -- that's psychosis, don't cha know.
July 10, 2004
Civilization's Gonna Die!
Bush Presses Case Against Gay MarriageWASHINGTON - President Bush says legalizing gay marriage would redefine the most fundamental institution of civilization and that a constitutional amendment is needed to protect it.What in the fuck is it with the right wing and the downfall of civilization?
Gay marriage will threaten civilization! Terrorism, if not utterly eliminated from existence, will destroy civilization! Britney Spears will cause the downfall of civilization! OK, that last one might be true.
What in the hell do right wingers think civilization is, a house of cards? I got news for you goofuses. Civilization ain't all that fragile. It's been around for 1,000s of years and survived a lot worse than anything facing us today, except nukes or maybe environmental disaster. And it'll take a fair number of nukes to end civilization. One here and there ain't gonna do it.
Anybody who's buying that stupid-ass argument needs to have their head examined, and soon. Opposition to gay marriage is based on nothing more than superstition, not that I'm expecting the majority of Americans to recognize that any time soon.
Uh when my right hand itches -- I gets money for sho'
But when God talks to me -- that's psychosis, don't cha know.
posted
4:12 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
But if a judge hadn't ordered the state to release the list, the public would never have known about the serious flaws.
OK, Now It's Good News
Fla. Scraps Flawed Felon Voting ListBut if a judge hadn't ordered the state to release the list, the public would never have known about the serious flaws.
posted
4:07 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
All I gotta say is it's way past time for the Repukes to quit whining that blacks don't vote Repukelican. I only know one black Republican and you'd never know he was black except that he makes it a point to tell you. He's family. He's a Military officer currently in Iraq, his second tour, and I'm not too sure he's gonna be voting for Bushy Boy this time around. His poor wife's worried sick and I doubt she will either.
For you right wing assholes who think I don't support the troops, tell me, you think I want family killed over there? I've never done anything but support the troops. It's that smirking jackass in the White House who's never faced fire in his life that I don't support
Time For GOP To Stop Whining
BushCo initially claimed that Bush couldn't address the NAACP due to scheduling conflicts. Not surprisingly, that was a lie. It turns out Bush won't address the NAACP because they hurt his widdle feelings. Seeing the Forest has a little exercise in, well, seeing the forest on this issue.All I gotta say is it's way past time for the Repukes to quit whining that blacks don't vote Repukelican. I only know one black Republican and you'd never know he was black except that he makes it a point to tell you. He's family. He's a Military officer currently in Iraq, his second tour, and I'm not too sure he's gonna be voting for Bushy Boy this time around. His poor wife's worried sick and I doubt she will either.
For you right wing assholes who think I don't support the troops, tell me, you think I want family killed over there? I've never done anything but support the troops. It's that smirking jackass in the White House who's never faced fire in his life that I don't support
posted
3:28 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Somehow, Florida managed leave nearly all Hispanic felons off their voter purge list, and Florida may be the only state in the union where Hispanics are more likely to vote Republican than Democrat. Feature that.
Sumpin' Still Smells Funny In Florida
Unintentional, My AssSomehow, Florida managed leave nearly all Hispanic felons off their voter purge list, and Florida may be the only state in the union where Hispanics are more likely to vote Republican than Democrat. Feature that.
posted
10:08 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Now, lemme drag my hammer back out, cuz if I had a hammer, I'd hammer in the morning, I'd hammer in the evening, all over Bush/Cheney.
Repukes criticize Kerry/Edwards "hate fest."
Thank God big, hairy Bush and his buddy Little Bitty Dick hold to conservative values, like telling Senator Leahy to go fuck himself on the Senate Floor. Ya know, strong, conservative values, like lying your ass off whenever it suits your purpose. Lying to Congress and the public about the costs of the Medicare prescription drug bill. Lying about who will benefit from massive tax cuts. Or, ya know, even little shit, like lying the country into an unnecessary (and therefore immoral) war, in violation of international law, that has cost the lives of 1,000s of Iraqis, over a thousand American soldiers [Correction: Over 1,000 coalition deaths, over 880 American deaths.], and left many thousands more of each maimed for life. There's some mainstream American values for ya.
Speakin' a lyin' us into war, I see there's a big push on to blame the CIA for that. The declassified version of the October 2002 National Intelligence estimate was considerably altered from the original. Caveats and dissents were removed. Assessments were changed into statements of fact. See Key Revisions Were Made to CIA Document. If the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee is telling the truth, then the gross, hairy Bush Admin's statements about the justifications for war went well beyond what was in the classified NIE.
I know the prez, any prez, can't read every word that crosses his desk, and I know that this prez ain't real big on readin'. But we're talkin' about war here. If Bush didn't lie about the reasons for war, then he's shown himself to be a total incompetent. Either way, how can any American who gives half a damn about American values or conservative values vote for Bush?
I'm serious about that question. I'd really like to know. How 'bout it, piggy? I know you're still out there shadowing me. I see all your visits at Sitemeter. Oops, I forgot. You're no longer allowed to comment here, are ya? So why are you still reading me, piggy? Are you hoping to get me arrested for something I say? If so, good. I'm pretty much hopin' for the same thing.
The "Values" Debate
First things first, I criticized Richard "Little Dick" Cheney for transforming "American values" into "conservative values" in attacking John Kerry. At the time I was unaware that Kerry actually had said he represented conservative values. I don't know what the hell Kerry was thinking, but that lets Cheney off the hook for this one relatively minor issue. I try to correct my mistakes when I find them. All I can say is, oops and mea culpabilly.Now, lemme drag my hammer back out, cuz if I had a hammer, I'd hammer in the morning, I'd hammer in the evening, all over Bush/Cheney.
Repukes criticize Kerry/Edwards "hate fest."
Chase called Bush a liar and suggested that the United States invaded Iraq "just so he could be called a wartime president." Newman said Bush's tax cuts were "borderline criminal," and singer John Mellencamp performed a song that referred to the president as a "cheap thug."Oo-whee, that's some awful shit those people said. No wonder the Bush/Cheney perpetual campaign has criticized the event as a hate fest. Cuz, by and large, Americans are a bunch of prissy-ass pantywaists who recoil in horror at such awful behavior.
Even some in the friendly audience squirmed when Goldberg performed a comedy bit that employed Bush's surname as a sexual euphemism.
Thank God big, hairy Bush and his buddy Little Bitty Dick hold to conservative values, like telling Senator Leahy to go fuck himself on the Senate Floor. Ya know, strong, conservative values, like lying your ass off whenever it suits your purpose. Lying to Congress and the public about the costs of the Medicare prescription drug bill. Lying about who will benefit from massive tax cuts. Or, ya know, even little shit, like lying the country into an unnecessary (and therefore immoral) war, in violation of international law, that has cost the lives of 1,000s of Iraqis, over a thousand American soldiers [Correction: Over 1,000 coalition deaths, over 880 American deaths.], and left many thousands more of each maimed for life. There's some mainstream American values for ya.
Speakin' a lyin' us into war, I see there's a big push on to blame the CIA for that. The declassified version of the October 2002 National Intelligence estimate was considerably altered from the original. Caveats and dissents were removed. Assessments were changed into statements of fact. See Key Revisions Were Made to CIA Document. If the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee is telling the truth, then the gross, hairy Bush Admin's statements about the justifications for war went well beyond what was in the classified NIE.
I know the prez, any prez, can't read every word that crosses his desk, and I know that this prez ain't real big on readin'. But we're talkin' about war here. If Bush didn't lie about the reasons for war, then he's shown himself to be a total incompetent. Either way, how can any American who gives half a damn about American values or conservative values vote for Bush?
I'm serious about that question. I'd really like to know. How 'bout it, piggy? I know you're still out there shadowing me. I see all your visits at Sitemeter. Oops, I forgot. You're no longer allowed to comment here, are ya? So why are you still reading me, piggy? Are you hoping to get me arrested for something I say? If so, good. I'm pretty much hopin' for the same thing.
posted
6:55 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 09, 2004
This is way too good to be missed.
July 09, 2004
Any Lie At All: Kerry's The Flip-Flopper
President Bush: Flip-Flopper-In-ChiefThis is way too good to be missed.
posted
4:14 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Everything's Ideological--Even Science
UnFreakin' Believable!
At least it woulda been before Dubya got selected.Everything's Ideological--Even Science
More than 4000 scientists, 48 of them Nobel Prize winners, got together to blast the [Bush Administration's] politicization of science for ideological reasons. 4000 of them.Of course, the Bushies are denying it. They'll tell any lie, any lie at all. Lying is a way of life for them.
posted
1:26 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Must Read For Anti-Minimum Wagers
In The Minimum Wage and the EITC, Brad DeLong quotes Steven Landsburg's article in Slate:Now that we've re-evaluated the evidence with all this in mind, here's what most labor economists believe: The minimum wage kills very few jobs, and the jobs it kills were lousy jobs anyway. It is almost impossible to maintain the old argument that minimum wages are bad for minimum-wage workers. In fact, the minimum wage is very good for unskilled workers.I get the strong impression from what he writes that somebody's been manipulating which minimum wage studies got published. Soon, maybe, the right will have to come up with a new lie to oppose the minimum wage. After all, they dassn't admit that they're cheap labor conservatives.
posted
10:36 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July Surprise?
By Any Means At All
PAKISTAN FOR BUSH.July Surprise?
A third source, an official who works under ISI's director, Lieutenant General Ehsan ul-Haq, informed tnr that the Pakistanis "have been told at every level that apprehension or killing of HVTs [high-value targets] before [the] election is [an] absolute must." What's more, this source claims that Bush administration officials have told their Pakistani counterparts they have a date in mind for announcing this achievement: "The last ten days of July deadline has been given repeatedly by visitors to Islamabad and during [ul-Haq's] meetings in Washington." Says McCormack: "I'm aware of no such comment." But according to this ISI official, a White House aide told ul-Haq last spring that "it would be best if the arrest or killing of [any] HVT were announced on twenty-six, twenty-seven, or twenty-eight July"--the first three days of the Democratic National Convention in Boston.
posted
4:54 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Defining Dissent Down
Crocodile Tears Over The "Uncivil" Left
"We are trying to change the tones in the state capitals -- and turn them toward bitter nastiness and partisanship," Grover Norquist told the Denver Post. "Bipartisanship is another name for date rape." And "liberal" pundits are saying to the rapists, "Here, let me help you get my clothes off." Rob Salkowitz at Emphasis Added gets it.Defining Dissent Down
We live in a time when liberal values are under sustained and merciless attack. Our opponents are not interested in reasoning with us or compromising. They don't give a damn what anyone to the left of Colin Powell (if that) thinks about anything and are so convinced of their own rightness that they seize every opportunity to cut opponents out of the conversation. They lie, mislead, withhold important information, shout down and belittle critics rather than engage their ideas, and respond with dark threats when their authority is challenged. If it takes someone like Michael Moore to answer fire with fire, so be it. This is not the time to be splitting intellectual hairs, when the entire conception of the liberal state is at risk.Tip O'The Tam to Orcinus.
Every time the center-left has extended Bush and the Republicans the benefit of the doubt, from failing to vigorously contest the election outcome to the Patriot Act to the authorizing resolution on Iraq, they have been made to look like fools and dupes. Daschle and Gephardt tried to play ball after 9/11 and got rolled over. The conservatism of Democrats like Mary Landrieu, Max Cleland and Martin Frost didn't buy them a whit of slack from the Republican attack machine, which pulled out all the stops to slime and defeat them by fair means and foul.
OK, message received: this is hardball. The only principle at stake is the maintenance of conservative power in government, and toward that end, any means is permissible. Those are the ethics of our opponents. So why are liberal-leaning opinion leaders still hemming and hawing, taking Republican spin-points about Moore and "leftist rage" seriously? How many times do we have to get played before we realize that it's time to close ranks and quit giving cover to people who have no use for the least of our values?
I understand the impulse to be fair and reasonable, but really, trusting that Bush's motives are anything but completely alien to moderate and liberal American values is an abdication of responsibility by the loyal opposition. Civility is a two-way street: you give in order to get. In today's climate of fear and loathing fostered by right-wing extremists, the only purpose served by civility on the left is to keep the truth from being spoken too loudly or too honestly. Sorry, that's not an agenda I buy into. Moore might be wrong about a few little things, but he's right about the big thing: the threat that Bushism represents to the freedoms, value and aspirations of Americans.
posted
2:57 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 08, 2004
July 08, 2004
Screw The Rules, Again
House GOP Defends Patriot Act PowersBut the victory came only after GOP tactics infuriated Democrats and a number of Republicans. The vote, scheduled to last 15 minutes, dragged on for 38 minutes despite outraged shouts and a unified chant of "shame, shame, shame" from Democrats across the aisle.Being a Repukelican means using any means at all. (Sorry, Butch. I know you're not all evil. Just most.)
[snip]
"The Republican leadership is out of control," said Rep. Martin T. Meehan (D-Mass.). "Today's vote on the Freedom to Read Protection Act is just the latest example of a growing trend towards abusive, closed-fist partisanship on the part of Republican House leadership."
Rep. C.L. Butch Otter (R-Idaho), a conservative and an advocate of the defeated provision, told reporters after the vote: "You win some, and some get stolen."
posted
9:35 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
More "Good" News From Iraq
AP: Iraq Insurgency Larger Than ThoughtBAGHDAD, Iraq - The Iraq insurgency is far larger than the 5,000 guerrillas previously thought to be at its core, U.S. military officials say, and it's being led by well-armed Iraqi Sunnis angry at being pushed from power alongside Saddam Hussein.Political opposition. Sweet. Can anybody explain to me why Bush is still doing so well in the polls? I know Kerry sucks, but Bush is like a vacuum cleaner powered by a top-fuel dragster engine.
Although U.S. military analysts disagree over the exact size, dozens of regional cells, often led by tribal sheiks and inspired by Sunni Muslim imams, can call upon part-time fighters to boost forces to as high as 20,000 — an estimate reflected in the insurgency's continued strength after U.S. forces killed as many as 4,000 in April alone.
[snip]
The official and others told The Associated Press the guerrillas have enough popular support among nationalist Iraqis angered by the presence of U.S. troops that they cannot be militarily defeated.
[snip]
Most of the insurgents are fighting for a bigger role in a secular society, not a Taliban-like Islamic state, the military official said. Almost all the guerrillas are Iraqis, even those launching some of the devastating car bombings normally blamed on foreigners — usually al-Zarqawi.
The official said many car bombings bore the "tradecraft" of Saddam's former secret police and were aimed at intimidating Iraq's new security services.
Many in the U.S. intelligence community have been making similar points, but have encountered political opposition from the Bush administration, a State Department official in Washington said, also speaking on condition of anonymity.
posted
9:01 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Reading all the critics of Fahrenheit 9/11, you haven't heard much about Lila Lipscomb, have you? I know I haven't read much about her, yet she is the most powerful argument in Moore's F9/11. She tears your heart out. Why doesn't the right deal with her? They don't dare, that's why. They don't dare much, cowards that they are.
LIes Have Consequences
The lie that killed my sonReading all the critics of Fahrenheit 9/11, you haven't heard much about Lila Lipscomb, have you? I know I haven't read much about her, yet she is the most powerful argument in Moore's F9/11. She tears your heart out. Why doesn't the right deal with her? They don't dare, that's why. They don't dare much, cowards that they are.
posted
7:17 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
South Africa's transformation amazes me. I know it's not perfect (What is?), but it's amazing nonetheless.
Good Things Happen Too
S. Africa as Seen in a MirrorSouth Africa's transformation amazes me. I know it's not perfect (What is?), but it's amazing nonetheless.
posted
6:46 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Mark Twain, who I think was the greatest American writer, did a similar thing. He felt whites owed it to blacks because of what we've done to them. I'm glad Bill Cosby is doing it, but when will American society take responsibility for the past, and the present?
Cosby Takes Responsibility - Will We?
Cosby Paying for Education of 2 StudentsMark Twain, who I think was the greatest American writer, did a similar thing. He felt whites owed it to blacks because of what we've done to them. I'm glad Bill Cosby is doing it, but when will American society take responsibility for the past, and the present?
posted
6:29 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
We imprison more of our population than any country in the world. Many times more than most countries. Either our incarceration rates are too high, in which case shouldn't we ask, "Why?" Or our crime rate is way too high, in which case shouldn't we ask, "Why?" Are there any "conservatives" asking why?
Imprisonment Rate Reason To Question Policy
Land of the Free FactoidWe imprison more of our population than any country in the world. Many times more than most countries. Either our incarceration rates are too high, in which case shouldn't we ask, "Why?" Or our crime rate is way too high, in which case shouldn't we ask, "Why?" Are there any "conservatives" asking why?
posted
6:09 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Hot Damn! I'm A Conservative!
Prudence, Progression, and Permanence: The Conservative Philosophy of Russell KirkRussell Kirk outlined ten conservative principles; below I've excerpted those which a progressive would have the most difficulty disagree (sic) with:But the right wing sure ain't.
posted
6:03 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Mylroie as Bush Rasputine
Discrediting Those Damn Liberal Academics
Juan Cole tries to separate truth from lunacy.Mylroie as Bush Rasputine
Peter Bergen, veteran journalist and al-Qaeda expert, raises the question of whether the bizarre and crackpot theories of Laurie Mylroie have undue influence high in the US government. Mylroie alleges that Iraq was behind the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, a thesis for which there is no evidence whatsoever. Yet she seems to have convinced Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz of it.Now I think liberal thinktanks are more reliable than right wing thinktanks, but that's my best guess. I don't actually know. To my knowledge, all so-called thinktanks publish without peer review. I much prefer peer reviewed academics. They might be liberal, but at least somebody checks up on their work. I want the closest approximation to objective reality that I can get. Peer review helps a lot. Murray and Hernstein's The Bell Curve was never submitted for peer review, it had an enormous effect on the race debate in this country (It's still being cited by half-wit racists.), and when academics did examine the book they found it was full of shit. I want peer review. That's the kind of stupid left winger I am.
In the academic world, we don't get to publish our books at academic presses without peer review. When Princeton University Press considered my book, written out of the Egyptian National Archives, on the 19th century Urabi Revolt, the editor sent the manuscript to eminent experts in 19th century Egyptian history. Now, I lived in the Arab world for 6 years, have a degree in Arabic studies from Cairo, and had a Fulbright grant for my research. I spent a year working almost daily in the archives in Cairo. I had an academic position in a major department at a major university. But Princeton University Press did not trust me. They still had the book refereed.
In contrast, the American Enterprise Institute publishes anything Mylroie hands into them, no matter how fantastic. She does not speak Arabic, has never been in any Iraqi archive, and has no standing in the Middle East field. Her books don't have to be refereed, apparently. The poor lay reader who finds her book in Borders has no way of distinguishing it from the trade paperbacks of Princeton University Press. And then the mere fact of the book's existence can become a reference-point in political debate. No university press would have published Mylroie's pablum, because academic researchers would have shot it down for poor evidence and bad reasoning.
You'd think that where people are writing about issues that involve life and death, war and peace in the contemporary world, it would be more important to have the books refereed. Nineteenth century history we could get wrong and survive.
The tragedy is that people will go on believing Mylroie's weirdness, and she will keep getting invited on t.v. and to speak to Congress, and AEI will not suffer a loss of credibility because of this fiasco. If an assistant professor in a university wrote such nonsense, the person would never get tenure and would end up unemployed.
I guess if you have the backing of enough incredibly rich people, you can get away with almost anything.
posted
5:21 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 07, 2004
Follow the links. See what you think.
July 07, 2004
What Is Truth?
Yah, Ok, socialists can be dull people. But I ain't lookin' for perfection, I'm lookin' for a better world. I don't know that socialism wiill lead to that. But I know that money is not the measure of all things that matter to human beings. Is Orwell wrong? I don't know. But I know that greed is not the measure of all things.Follow the links. See what you think.
posted
6:42 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Follow the links. Let Langston Hughes defend him self. If you don't cry at his self defense, then fuck you. Fuck you in the ass. Assuming you wouldn't like that. I'd as soon kill you as look at you. Langston Hughes was a decent, honest man. Can a right winger say the same?
Attacking Langston Hughes
The Conservatives attempts at attacking Langston HughesFollow the links. Let Langston Hughes defend him self. If you don't cry at his self defense, then fuck you. Fuck you in the ass. Assuming you wouldn't like that. I'd as soon kill you as look at you. Langston Hughes was a decent, honest man. Can a right winger say the same?
posted
6:12 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Yeah. Legal, maybe. But any way you cut it the Bush Administration told a major lie about major legislation to both congress and the public. Bush is the only member of the Administration who bears responsibility for what his Administration does. Nobody's been fired. Bush is directly responsible for that lie, and ignorance is no excuse. How can anyone, in good conscience, vote to reselect Bush?
If It's Legal, It's Not Wrong
Report: Bush Legal in Medicare WithholdingYeah. Legal, maybe. But any way you cut it the Bush Administration told a major lie about major legislation to both congress and the public. Bush is the only member of the Administration who bears responsibility for what his Administration does. Nobody's been fired. Bush is directly responsible for that lie, and ignorance is no excuse. How can anyone, in good conscience, vote to reselect Bush?
posted
10:32 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Right Wing Consistency - Waste And Fraud Division
Pentagon Deputy's Probes in Iraq Weren't Authorized, Officials SayWASHINGTON — A senior Defense Department official conducted unauthorized investigations of Iraq reconstruction efforts and used their results to push for lucrative contracts for friends and their business clients, according to current and former Pentagon officials and documents.Where are all the right wingers we usually depend on to scream, "Waste and fraud! Waste and fraud!" like fucking parrots on an endless loop? Jesus, the Gropinator got elected by parroting that crap back to people. Now, all of sudden, they act like deaf, mute, and blind monkeys. Couldn't have anything to do with which party's in power, could it?
posted
8:58 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Stupid Campaign Tricks
The Bush/Cheney campaign and many on the right are floating the meme that John McCain was John Kerry's first choice as running mate. Maybe I'm too sophisticated to get campaign propaganda. I don't know. I rarely get accused of sophistication, that's all I know. But hasn't Bush/Cheney been portraying John Kerry as much too liberal? And isn't claiming that Kerry's first choice for VP was a moderate Republican in direct conflict with the too liberal claim? If Kerry's first choice was McCain, doesn't that argue that he was eager to work with moderates and centrists? I don't think that's a compliment, but most people would. I just don't see how this campaign meme helps the Repukes.
posted
8:45 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
I think freedom of belief is fundamental to a democracy. Ya might could talk me into restricting racial hate speech, but even that's touchy. No way you could talk me into restricting religious hate speech. Freedom of belief. Religion is belief. Everyone, pro-religion or con, must have the freedom to believe as they choose, and they must have the right to express their belief. The primary difference between religious and racial hate speech to me is, religion is a belief. You can choose your beliefs. I know many people would find it difficult to change their religious beliefs, but it can be done. You have no choice about your race. Even if it's ever determined that some race is inferior to others, you'd still have to be a sick fuck to abuse members of that race because of it.
Don't nobody come on to me with that "meritocracy" bullshit, neither. Even if desirable (doubtful) a meritocracy is impossible because no one knows what merit is. It's all opinion, no facts.
How Free Should Speech Be?
Doubts grow over religious hate lawDavid Blunkett could face severe difficulties getting his resurrected pledge to criminalise incitement to religious hatred through parliament, it emerged today.I doubt either law would stand up to constitutional restrictions in the US, specifically the First Amendment. I don't think the US is the most free country in the world, but I do think we probably have the most free speech. Overall, I think that's probably good. I'd rather suffer the excesses of too much free speech than too little.
The home secretary revealed in a speech this morning that he would again press ahead with measures to outlaw attacks on religions which "stirred up hatred" along the lines of the existing legislation on inciting racial hatred.
I think freedom of belief is fundamental to a democracy. Ya might could talk me into restricting racial hate speech, but even that's touchy. No way you could talk me into restricting religious hate speech. Freedom of belief. Religion is belief. Everyone, pro-religion or con, must have the freedom to believe as they choose, and they must have the right to express their belief. The primary difference between religious and racial hate speech to me is, religion is a belief. You can choose your beliefs. I know many people would find it difficult to change their religious beliefs, but it can be done. You have no choice about your race. Even if it's ever determined that some race is inferior to others, you'd still have to be a sick fuck to abuse members of that race because of it.
Don't nobody come on to me with that "meritocracy" bullshit, neither. Even if desirable (doubtful) a meritocracy is impossible because no one knows what merit is. It's all opinion, no facts.
posted
8:10 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
The pro-racists and anti-racists all accuse each other of ideological bias on race. That certainly seems true of the pro-racists, it's harder to judge the anti-racists. But, since I'm regularly accused of ideological bias, I'm going to say again that I don't believe I have an ideology. Here's how Merriam-Webster's defines ideology:
But that's the dictionary definition. Here's why I think I'm not ideological. There isn't a single idea in my head that is not subject to change in the light of new information. Not even my most precious idea, that the best form of government known to man is representative democracy and that government's sole just authority derives from the informed consent of the governed. I believe that passionately, but I'll change my view given the right combination of logic and evidence.
Probably my second most passionate view is that I hate racism. I'll tell ya when I'll accept that one race is superior to another. When there is a consensus of scientific opinion saying that. I doubt that will happen. Near as I can tell the current scientific consensus is that, biologically, race doesn't even exist. But if it happens, I'll change my views. I believe global warming is real and that human activity significantly contributes to it. Why? Because that is what the huge majority of atmospheric climatologists believe. These people who think they can reasonably decide about such an issue based on their own analysis crack me up. Probably 99% of them can't even understand the math. I know I can't. It's ridiculous to think that an individual non-specialist can make a more accurate decision about global warming than the specialists in the field can. We pretty much, most of us, just have to trust science. And don't tell me some scientists disagree on global warming. Of course some do. Some scientists will always disagree in any field. It's idiotic to demand 100% consensus before you'll accept something.
A word to those who claim that this "faith" in science is no different from "faith" in God. I can't see the evidence for God. Maybe it's there, but I can't see it. I can see the evidence of the effectiveness of the scientific method all around me. My trust in science is not based on faith, it's based on experience, evidence, and reason. See the difference?
Science, Racism, And Decent Conservatives
Orcinus sez:I don't give enough credit to serious conservatives who make real efforts to repudiate the racist element of the right. Tacitus deserves a round of applause.I got to agree with Orcinus so I'm going so far as to put Tacitus on the blogroll. At least until I come across something he's written that's truly stupid. If you read on to the comments section, be prepared for some seriously scientific arguments, as well as some seriously pseudo-scientific ones.
The pro-racists and anti-racists all accuse each other of ideological bias on race. That certainly seems true of the pro-racists, it's harder to judge the anti-racists. But, since I'm regularly accused of ideological bias, I'm going to say again that I don't believe I have an ideology. Here's how Merriam-Webster's defines ideology:
1 : visionary theorizingClaiming that I'm a visionary theorizer would just give me way too much credit. I don't have a systematic body of concepts. I'm not too systematic about much of anything. It's probably a character flaw. Definition b would label everyone ideological, and I think that's a bit much. Throw it out. Then c gets into integration. I'm about as integrated, mentally, as I am systematic.
2 a : a systematic body of concepts especially about human life or culture b : a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture c : the integrated assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program
But that's the dictionary definition. Here's why I think I'm not ideological. There isn't a single idea in my head that is not subject to change in the light of new information. Not even my most precious idea, that the best form of government known to man is representative democracy and that government's sole just authority derives from the informed consent of the governed. I believe that passionately, but I'll change my view given the right combination of logic and evidence.
Probably my second most passionate view is that I hate racism. I'll tell ya when I'll accept that one race is superior to another. When there is a consensus of scientific opinion saying that. I doubt that will happen. Near as I can tell the current scientific consensus is that, biologically, race doesn't even exist. But if it happens, I'll change my views. I believe global warming is real and that human activity significantly contributes to it. Why? Because that is what the huge majority of atmospheric climatologists believe. These people who think they can reasonably decide about such an issue based on their own analysis crack me up. Probably 99% of them can't even understand the math. I know I can't. It's ridiculous to think that an individual non-specialist can make a more accurate decision about global warming than the specialists in the field can. We pretty much, most of us, just have to trust science. And don't tell me some scientists disagree on global warming. Of course some do. Some scientists will always disagree in any field. It's idiotic to demand 100% consensus before you'll accept something.
A word to those who claim that this "faith" in science is no different from "faith" in God. I can't see the evidence for God. Maybe it's there, but I can't see it. I can see the evidence of the effectiveness of the scientific method all around me. My trust in science is not based on faith, it's based on experience, evidence, and reason. See the difference?
posted
7:06 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 06, 2004
My question to any working person would be, don't you feel cheated? Republican or Democrat, I don't care. Don't you feel cheated? Throw out the ideology, throw out the wedge issues, all I'm asking is, don't you feel cheated? Because you should. Do you honestly think that the wealthy elite who collected most of that new wealth are really that much better than you? I don't.
You could look at some of the abuse I've taken on this site, though I doubt you'll feel like hunting for it. I will try to honestly summarize some of it. I'm an idiot because I used to be a janitor. Remember the days when there was no shame in honest work? I'm a mental defective because I've never risen above the working class. The same working class my great grandfather belonged to, and there was no shame in it in his day. The same working class that my grandfather started in, though he did rise to a high executive position eventually. The same working class that my mother, an LVN, was a part of. And there was never any shame in their being working class. Now I'm supposed to hang my head in shame for being a member of the working class because some Republican says so. If you're one of those who think that, I got a little message for you: Sit on it and rotate, motherfucker. I'm at least as good as you and probably better. Money is not the measure of all things.
Like most Americans, I'm working class. Therefore I don't deserve to make a decent living, not should I be allowed to reproduce. Who says? By what authority? It's way past time working class people in this country started voting for their own interests. Yeah, I know, neither party truly represents our interests. The liberal elites don't really give a shit about us, as right wingers love to point out, but the conservative elites, who seldom get mentioned, are downright hostile towards us. For better or worse, I think the Dems are where we have to start. If you strongly feel differently, I can understand that. If that's the case, then work to change the Republican Party. Make them represent us. Someone should sure as hell be representing our interests. We are the majority.
Cross-posted at From the Trenches.
July 06, 2004
The Shame Of Cheap Labor "Conservatives"
The shame of American homelessnessThe economic crunch faced by America's working poor is stark. Since 1979, U.S. housing costs have tripled. Some of that growth is the result of well-meant initiatives, such as slum clearance and rigorous building-code enforcement that forces rents upward. But governments have not compensated for the low-income housing deficit with more rent subsidies or more public housing. Both, in fact, have been gradually disappearing. Meanwhile, real pay, in dollars adjusted for inflation, went up just 1 percent from 1979 to 2003, the same period housing costs went through the roof.They don't adjust the change in housing costs for inflation, and they should have. But if you use the trusty-dusty CPI inflation calculator you will find that real housing costs, the biggest part of any working person's budget, rose 20% while real wages rose 1%. This was during a period in which America as a whole got indisputably richer. Measured by the increase in GDP, America got 90% wealthier. Nearly double. But real wages went up one percent over the same period. That huge increase in wealth sure didn't go to much of anyone in the bottom 60%. Ya know, the majority?
My question to any working person would be, don't you feel cheated? Republican or Democrat, I don't care. Don't you feel cheated? Throw out the ideology, throw out the wedge issues, all I'm asking is, don't you feel cheated? Because you should. Do you honestly think that the wealthy elite who collected most of that new wealth are really that much better than you? I don't.
You could look at some of the abuse I've taken on this site, though I doubt you'll feel like hunting for it. I will try to honestly summarize some of it. I'm an idiot because I used to be a janitor. Remember the days when there was no shame in honest work? I'm a mental defective because I've never risen above the working class. The same working class my great grandfather belonged to, and there was no shame in it in his day. The same working class that my grandfather started in, though he did rise to a high executive position eventually. The same working class that my mother, an LVN, was a part of. And there was never any shame in their being working class. Now I'm supposed to hang my head in shame for being a member of the working class because some Republican says so. If you're one of those who think that, I got a little message for you: Sit on it and rotate, motherfucker. I'm at least as good as you and probably better. Money is not the measure of all things.
Like most Americans, I'm working class. Therefore I don't deserve to make a decent living, not should I be allowed to reproduce. Who says? By what authority? It's way past time working class people in this country started voting for their own interests. Yeah, I know, neither party truly represents our interests. The liberal elites don't really give a shit about us, as right wingers love to point out, but the conservative elites, who seldom get mentioned, are downright hostile towards us. For better or worse, I think the Dems are where we have to start. If you strongly feel differently, I can understand that. If that's the case, then work to change the Republican Party. Make them represent us. Someone should sure as hell be representing our interests. We are the majority.
Cross-posted at From the Trenches.
posted
6:31 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Florida recount study: Bush still wins
The story reports that the consortium use several different count scenarios. Under Gore's four county recount strategy, they found Bush still would of won. That scenario was very unlikely to take place because the Florida Supreme Court had already rule for a statewide recount of undervotes. But that's the only scenario reported under which Bush would have won. And that's not a statewide recount, as the lead suggests. Under three other scenarios, Gore would have won. And that's without counting deliberate vote suppression and disenfranchisement. So how can anyone claim that the consortium showed that Bush would have won?
If anyone has better information on this, I'm interested.
Who Won Florida In 2000?
Not the official result, but the result of a fair and reasonable count. I don't know for sure. Right wingers think they do know. They cite the Florida consortium recount as proof that Bush would've won the recount. That's certainly what most of the headlines said. In this example, it's even in the lead.Florida recount study: Bush still wins
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A comprehensive study of the 2000 presidential election in Florida suggests that if the U.S. Supreme Court had allowed a statewide vote recount to proceed, Republican candidate George W. Bush would still have been elected president.That's the lead, but I swear I don't see how the rest of the story supports it. And it's supposed to.
The story reports that the consortium use several different count scenarios. Under Gore's four county recount strategy, they found Bush still would of won. That scenario was very unlikely to take place because the Florida Supreme Court had already rule for a statewide recount of undervotes. But that's the only scenario reported under which Bush would have won. And that's not a statewide recount, as the lead suggests. Under three other scenarios, Gore would have won. And that's without counting deliberate vote suppression and disenfranchisement. So how can anyone claim that the consortium showed that Bush would have won?
If anyone has better information on this, I'm interested.
posted
11:51 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 05, 2004
July 05, 2004
Is This Why The Right Says Bad Things About Soros?
Soros Invests in His Democratic PassionFor two decades, [George] Soros has spent billions of his own money on an international network aimed at building civil society in authoritarian or onetime communist countries. In recent years, he has focused on the former Soviet states of Central Asia — places where governments may welcome his money but feel threatened by his commitment to democracy.And it seems to be having the same effect in the US.
[snip]
Soros is used to provoking strong emotions, especially now that he has plunged into U.S. politics, funding groups opposed to President Bush's reelection. His work overseas has won him the admiration of pro-democracy activists and the suspicion of autocrats.
posted
12:29 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Puggy Pearson won the world championship of poker many years ago. He was a life time professional player. He said about cheating that he could sit down in a game and, in a relatively short period of time, know if there was cheating going on. He didn't mean that he necessarily knew who was cheating or how, only that he could tell the game wasn't going right, things didn't add up. As Puggy said, "Somethin's not right." That's how I feel about the media.
Somethin's Not Right - In The "Liberal" Media
Brad DeLong sez:A normal person, reading Jonathan Weisman in the Washington Post on June 8, would conclude (i) that Steven Moore is an economist, and (ii) that Kevin Hassett, Eric Engen, Glenn Hubbard, Greg Mankiw, and many other economists are "reevaluating" the view that budget deficits are a significant minus for the economy, believe that "the argument against deficits is more about self-righteous moralism than economics," and broadly agree with Richard Cheney's declaration that "deficits don't matter":Why is the Washinton Post selling, in a news story, the idea that deficits don't matter?
Puggy Pearson won the world championship of poker many years ago. He was a life time professional player. He said about cheating that he could sit down in a game and, in a relatively short period of time, know if there was cheating going on. He didn't mean that he necessarily knew who was cheating or how, only that he could tell the game wasn't going right, things didn't add up. As Puggy said, "Somethin's not right." That's how I feel about the media.
posted
8:35 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Tell Me This Ain't A Plutocracy
A Failure of FairnessWhen corporate executives gush over any bill with the word "fairness" in its title, consumers had best check their wallets. The proposed Class Action Fairness Act, which big-business leaders and their friends in the U.S. Senate may pass Tuesday after years of trying, is a distressing example.
[snip]
The more than 400 corporate lobbyists who have spent some $40 million to win passage of this bill have gotten lawmakers' attention. Despite opposition from virtually every environmental, consumers' and patients' rights group, plus state chief justices and California Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer, Senate leaders have not allowed a single hearing on the bill in advance of Tuesday's scheduled vote. Now, who thinks that's "fair"?
posted
8:14 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Proud To Be An American . . .
MORE THAN 100 CHILDREN IMPRISONED; REPORT OF ABUSE BY U.S. SOLDIERS.The TV Magazine also reported of evidence and eye witness reports according to which U.S. soldiers also abused children and youthful detainees. Samuel Provance, a staff sergeant stationed in the now infamous Abu Ghraib prison said that interrogating officers had pressured a 15 or 16 year old girl. Military police had only intervened when the girl was already half undressed. On another occasion, a 16 year old was soaked with water, driven through the cold, and then smeared with mud.Right wingers have tried to equate being proud to be an American with loving America. You don't have to be proud of your child to love your child. Same goes for America, which is good, cuz it's gettin' pretty damn hard to be proud of America.
posted
7:35 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Moore: pirate my film, no problem
Moore's A Greedy, Manipulative Bastard
That's what the right claims, but. . .Moore: pirate my film, no problem
Controversial film-maker Michael Moore has welcomed the appearance on the internet of pirated copies of his anti-Bush documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 and claimed he is happy for anybody to download it free of charge.Yup. Moore is a greedy bastard who only makes films for the money. The right, on the other hand, is filled with high-minded people of principle. Ya know, principles like private property is sacrosanct.
The activist, author and director told the Sunday Herald that, as long as pirated copies of his film were not being sold, he had no problem with it being downloaded.
"I don’t agree with the copyright laws and I don’t have a problem with people downloading the movie and sharing it with people as long as they’re not trying to make a profit off my labour. I would oppose that," he said.
"I do well enough already and I made this film because I want the world, to change. The more people who see it the better, so I’m happy this is happening."
Ironically, the burgeoning underground market for Moore's much-debated documentary has been championed by both sides of the political divide. While left-wing sites promote the film’s message, opponents of the high-profile polemicist are urging people to "steal" their copy, thus denying its director his cut of the profits.People of high-minded principles. Except when their not. Except when they turn into modern-day Abbey Hoffman's saying, 'Steal this movie.' Except even Hoffman told people to steal his own book, not somebody else's.
posted
7:02 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 04, 2004
Follow the links. It's damned interesting.
July 04, 2004
What Could Be In The Media
Endangered Species: The Crusading PressFollow the links. It's damned interesting.
posted
1:48 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Bush Extols American 'Values' in West Virginia
The "Magisterial" President
This is the second story on the president's appearance in West Virginia that uses the word. Both stories paraphrased, one citing "experts," this one citing "analysts," so I don't know what was actually said, but one synonym for "magisterial" is dictatorial. Sounds about right to me.Bush Extols American 'Values' in West Virginia
Analysts said the Independence Day appearance gave the president a opportunity to step outside the confines of partisan politics and appeal to voters on a holiday that underscores the magisterial stature of the presidency.
posted
12:43 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
It's The 4th Of July
This is an X song, but it was written by Dave Alvin, formerly of the Blasters.4th Of JulyDon't ask me to explain it, but that's how I feel on the 4th of July. Maybe like I love America, but America don't love me. I think you'd have to hear it, the plaintiveness. Heyyy, baby, it's the 4th of July.
She's waitin' for me
when I get home from work
oh, but things ain't just the same
She turns out the light
and cries in the dark
won't answer when I call her name
On the stairs I smoke a
cigarette alone
Mexican kids are shootin'
fireworks below
Hey baby, it's the Fourth of July
Hey baby, it's the Fourth of July
She gives me her cheek
when I want her lips
but I don't have the strength to go
On the lost side of town
in a dark apartment
we gave up trying so long ago
On the stairs I smoke a
cigarette alone
Mexican kids are shootin'
fireworks below
Hey baby, it's the Fourth of July
Hey baby, it's the Fourth of July
What ever happened I
apologize
so dry your tears and baby
walk outside, it's the Fourth of July
On the stairs I smoke a
cigarette alone
Mexican kids are shootin'
fireworks below
Hey baby, it's the Fourth of July
Hey baby, Baby take a walk outside
posted
12:30 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
The Patriot's Act
I'm ready to call this idiotic political war off any time the right is ready to do so. But the right has to actually stop it. They have to repudiate the Coulters, the Hannitys, et al. They have to stop equating disagreement with evil. My guess is the fight's still on.
Jonah Goldberg's Patriotism
I didn't see this earlier. It is the LA Times companion piece to Michael Moore's version of The Patriot's Act below. I'm sure not approving of everything he says, but maybe if more of the right wing would talk and write like this we would be within reaching distance of understanding that we are Americans who disagree, often vehemently, it's true, but not enemies out to eliminate each other. It would be nice to believe so, at least on the 4th of July. Heyyy, baby, it's the fourth of July. I love Dave Alvin, loved the Blasters more.The Patriot's Act
Although I think it's absurd to argue that questioning a candidate's positions is the same as questioning his patriotism, it's all to the good that Democrats are fighting Republicans for the mantle of who's more patriotic. Indeed, something similar has been taking place on the academic left. Even the left's dashboard saint, Ralph Nader, can speak eloquently about the grand patriotic tradition of citizen activism that stems from the American founding.Of course, back before the Iraq war I was arguing with right wingers who insisted that nationalism (not patriotism) was a good thing and that I was an asshole for suggesting it wasn't. I wonder, am I deceived by the online community? Is there a good and decent, if misguided by my lights, right wing movement out there in the real world that is being ill-represented by the vicious, ugly, thug bastards who so often represent the right on the net?
What the left is slowly discovering — or rediscovering — is the difference between patriotism and nationalism. A nationalist gives his undying devotion to a people. A patriot gives his devotion to an ideal. " 'My country right or wrong' is a thing no patriot would think of saying except in a desperate case," the essayist G.K. Chesterton observed. "It is like saying, 'My mother, drunk or sober.' " Although we can debate how much of an atrocity the abuses at Abu Ghraib were, one reassuring sign was the near unanimity of opinion here at home that such acts were "un-American." In the past, the left was so contemptuous of what America stood for that the idea of something being un-American would have been considered a badge of honor.
I'm ready to call this idiotic political war off any time the right is ready to do so. But the right has to actually stop it. They have to repudiate the Coulters, the Hannitys, et al. They have to stop equating disagreement with evil. My guess is the fight's still on.
posted
11:38 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Iraqi "Sovereignty"
The Reincarnation of Saddam HusseinAccording to the Los Angeles Times, "U.S. and Iraqi authorities took pains to make the court proceedings appear to be solely an Iraqi undertaking."Soviet style show trials anyone? Any government that lies as consistently as the US government does, that uses words in the wonderful Alice in Wonderland, 1984 sort of way the US government does, is, at the very least, aiming for something similar to totalitarianism. And when the news media goes right along with them, what am I supposed to think?
In spite of the Statute of the Iraqi Special Tribunal's mandate of public hearings, no one save the two dozen or so people present in the courtroom were supposed to hear Saddam's words. But an audiotape of the proceedings was smuggled out to the media and listeners throughout the world.
A team of U.S. military officers censored the media coverage of the proceeding. They destroyed the videotapes of Saddam in chains and deleted the legal record of the statements of the 11 senior members of Saddam’s regime who appeared at the same hearing.
One journalist present in the courtroom revealed: "We learned later that the judge didn't order us to turn off our sound. The Americans lied - it was they who wanted no sound. The judge wanted sound and pictures."
[snip]
The timing of Thursday's court appearance corroborates Saddam's assertion that the whole thing was theater. The ink was hardly dry on the "sovereignty" transfer papers when Saddam was rushed into a televised court appearance to create the illusion that Iraqis are running the show.
Truthfully, however, American fingerprints are all over these proceedings. Bremer was responsible for drafting The Statute of the Iraqi Special Tribunal before which Saddam appeared. This "neutral" tribunal is financed by the United States. The FBI is leading the investigation. Also on the team are the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the Department of Justice. And although Iraqis have been given legal custody of Saddam, he remains in the physical custody of the Americans.
posted
8:43 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
GOPers - Proud Of The Florida Vote Swindles?
Voter-Purge List Of Felons Made PublicFlorida's error-prone list of 47,763 suspected felons who could be tossed from voter rolls before November's presidential election contains nearly three times as many registered Democrats as Republicans. Almost half are racial minorities.Course, the political and racial make-up of the list is prolly jus' a co-inky-dink. And Jebby and the boys was jus' doin' the right thing keepin' it a secret from the voters. Nobody said nothin' about the informed consent of the governed. It's just consent, any underhanded way you can get it.
posted
8:24 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Michael Moore's Treason
The Patriot's Act, by the awful Michael Moore.For too long now we have abandoned our flag to those who see it as a symbol of war and dominance, as a way to crush dissent at home. Flags are flying from the back of SUVs, rising high above car dealerships, plastering the windows of businesses and adorning paper bags from fast-food restaurants. But these flags are intended to send a message: "You're either with us or you're against us," "Bring it on!" or "Watch what you say, watch what you do."Well? Are you? Are you proud? It's time to take back our flag from those who use it to wipe their asses then proudly display it to the world, the shit stains there for all to see. Republican values are not American values.
[snip]
I think it's time for those of us who love this country - and everything it should stand for - to reclaim our flag from those who would use it to crush rights and freedoms, both here at home and overseas. We need to redefine what it means to be a proud American.
If you are one of those who love what President Bush has done for this country and believe you must blindly follow the president to deserve to fly the flag, you should ask yourself some difficult questions about just how proud you are of the America we now inhabit:
Are you proud that one in six children lives in poverty in America?
Are you proud that 40 million adult Americans are functional illiterates?
Are you proud that the bulk of the jobs being created these days are low- and minimum-wage jobs?
Are you proud of asking your fellow Americans to live on $5.15 an hour?
Are you proud that, according to a National Geographic Society survey, 85% of young adult Americans cannot find Iraq on the map (and 11% cannot find the United States!)?
Are you proud that the rest of the world, which poured out its heart to us after Sept. 11, now looks at us with disdain and disgust?
Are you proud that nearly 3 billion people on this planet do not have access to clean drinking water when we have the resources and technology to remedy this immediately?
Are you proud of the fact that our president sent our soldiers off to a war that had nothing to do with the self-defense of this country?
posted
8:12 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Why can't we have a headline like, "Cheney Lies His Ass Off Over Values?"
The modern right wing, as represented by the GOP, is not merely mistaken, not even merely filled with liars, it is evil. I'm actually sorry that I end up insulting supporters of the GOP who are not evil, but merely dupes, but there just ain't no way around it. They're evil now, and if they keep getting elected they're going to grow ever more evil.
GOP Lyin' In Your Face - Cheney Edition
Cheney Fires Back in Debate Over ValuesWhy can't we have a headline like, "Cheney Lies His Ass Off Over Values?"
Kerry in recent days has been invoking values with increasing frequency, promising a crowd in Minnesota on Friday, for example, that he would "honor the values that built our country."Notice the grotesque twist Cheney puts on things. The "values that built our country" are exactly the same as "conservative values." So only "conservatives" have a right to talk about values, only "conservatives" are real Americans, and everyone not a "conservative" is a sworn enemy of the values that built our country.
Cheney, serving notice that the Bush campaign won't cede what has traditionally been a favorite Republican issue, told a cheering crowd at Wheeling Park High School: "Sometimes I think John Kerry develops amnesia out on the campaign trail. His latest thing is to tell audiences that he holds conservative values."
The modern right wing, as represented by the GOP, is not merely mistaken, not even merely filled with liars, it is evil. I'm actually sorry that I end up insulting supporters of the GOP who are not evil, but merely dupes, but there just ain't no way around it. They're evil now, and if they keep getting elected they're going to grow ever more evil.
posted
7:50 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
GOP Lyin' In Your Face - Rumsfeld Edition
Rumsfeld 'Can't Imagine' Revived Military Draft [At least until after we've lied our way through this election.]"As a matter of fact, despite all the talk about the stress on the force, today we still are having very good results with respect to recruiting and retention. And we do not have a problem of attracting and retaining the people we need in the military," Rumsfeld said.As long as we don't have to do it voluntarily.
The Army this week will begin notifying 5,600 former soldiers from the Individual Ready Reserve, a rarely tapped personnel pool, that they are being involuntarily mobilized and deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.Yeah, I know, that stuff is all part of their "voluntary" commitment. It's also a slap in the face with an icy towel to anyone who believes Rumsfeld's no problems with attraction or retention lie.
The Army has also issued "stop-loss" orders prohibiting tens of thousands of soldiers designated to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan from leaving the military if their volunteer service commitment ends during their deployment.
posted
7:35 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 03, 2004
KRISTOF'S CHOICE!
Bush misled the nation into war. But people! Don't call it a lie!
July 03, 2004
It's OK To Call Dems Liars
The Daily Howler points out what no one else will. That our "liberal" pundits only whine when Republicans are being justifiably abused. They keep their prissy, elite, millionaire mouths shut when a Dem or a leftist is being unjustifiably abused. If you think the "liberal" media are on the side of the people in this country, then you should read The Daily Howler daily until you have been disabused of that silly notion. Nick Kristof thought it was awful that "leftists" would dare to call Bush a liar. But he never wrote a fucking word about Al Gore being called a liar. Hmmm.KRISTOF'S CHOICE!
Bush misled the nation into war. But people! Don't call it a lie!
Of course, a comical part of Kristof's piece is its recent discovery of deep concern about the use of that troubling L-word. The delicate scribe is quite concerned about its use in this election. But four years ago, the naughty word was tossed like confetti. Recall, for example, the headline on a June 16, 1999 New York Post editorial. AL GORE, LIAR, the headline screamed. And recall a bit of the political porn the editors peddled that day:
NEW YORK POST (6/16/99): This is hardly the latest of Gore's fibs and flubs. Remember his claim that he and his wife, Tipper, were the models for the couple in Erich Segal's "Love Story"? (Segal said they weren't.) His "memory" of spending his youth on a farm? (The son of a U.S. senator, he was raised in Washington's Fairfax Hotel.) And on "Larry King Live," he said he was instrumental in inventing the Internet. (The Internet was "invented" eight years before Gore entered Congress.)
Yes, that was June 1999 - with seventeen months of this clowning ahead. But there you see the Love Story nonsense - the gift of Kristof's own newspaper. (Do facts matter? Segal defended Gore's statements in this flap, although a cleverly couched story by Henneberger, in the Times, made many people think different.) And there you see the screaming nonsense about the farm chores and the fancy hotel. (Gore's statements were perfectly accurate.) And there you see "invented the Internet," being flogged by a gang of eds who lacked the slightest grasp of their subject. (Gore's comment was made to Wolf Blitzer, not King. And the editors put "invented" in quotes, the one word Gore never said.) Yes, this grinding nonsense was dumped on Gore's head for the full twenty months of the White House campaign, under endless GORE, LIAR headlines. But did the delicate Kristof speak up then, helping us gaze on his fine sensibility? No; his guild was happy with these stupid events. The L-word seemed to be just fine then, when good boys like Kristof knew to keep quiet. (So did scribes who now clog the web.) Only now, a good boy still, does he find that the word is corrupting.
posted
3:17 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
World leaders weigh sanctions on Sudan and say that Khartoum has little time to stop ethnic violence.
I hope this is a step in the right direction. It appears to be, and thank goodness for that.
Sudan: Maybe We'll Get It Right
U.S., U.N. Raise PressureWorld leaders weigh sanctions on Sudan and say that Khartoum has little time to stop ethnic violence.
I hope this is a step in the right direction. It appears to be, and thank goodness for that.
posted
2:11 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
I want to know, was that dishonest too? Is that unfair? And to the Moore critics in the mainstream media, did you do your job before the war? Did you help Americans make sure it was absolutely necessary to send America's sons and daughters into harm's way?
What's your excuse?
Hey! F9/11 Critics!
In "Fahrenheit 9/11," Michael Moore says, "They serve so that we don't have to. They offer to give up their lives so that we can be free. It is, remarkably, their gift to us. And all they ask for in return is that we never send them into harm's way unless it is absolutely necessary. Will they ever trust us again?"I want to know, was that dishonest too? Is that unfair? And to the Moore critics in the mainstream media, did you do your job before the war? Did you help Americans make sure it was absolutely necessary to send America's sons and daughters into harm's way?
What's your excuse?
posted
10:45 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Apparently, they submitted a whole lot of pretty funky signatures. I just want to remind everyone that the GOP is backing Nader. Probably because they really, really believe in doing the will of the people. Uh-huh. They know that if Nader's not in the race Bush has virtually no chance. They don't give a good Goddamn about the will of the people. All they care about is imposing their will on the people. A majority voted against the GOP last time, a majority will vote against the GOP this time. How 'bout this time majority wins?
UPDATE: Major Bush fund-raiser donates to Nader campaign
Do Anything: The GOP Doesn't Care What You Want
Nader Backers Abandon Ariz. Ballot EffortApparently, they submitted a whole lot of pretty funky signatures. I just want to remind everyone that the GOP is backing Nader. Probably because they really, really believe in doing the will of the people. Uh-huh. They know that if Nader's not in the race Bush has virtually no chance. They don't give a good Goddamn about the will of the people. All they care about is imposing their will on the people. A majority voted against the GOP last time, a majority will vote against the GOP this time. How 'bout this time majority wins?
UPDATE: Major Bush fund-raiser donates to Nader campaign
Billionaire Richard J. Egan built his reputation in politics as a major donor and fund-raiser for the Bush campaign, steering hundreds of thousands of dollars into Republican coffers in recent years. But now it appears Egan and his relatives are bankrolling a new candidate: independent presidential contender Ralph Nader.I guess he musta suddenly turned progressive.
posted
10:16 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Do Anything: The Modern GOP
The Rush to Wedlock PoliticsThe Senate Republicans' maneuver to stage a hurried, red-meat floor debate for President Bush's proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage is nothing more than low-grade political mischief. The majority leader,More bending and twisting of the rules for the sake of nothing more than political theater. Ain't a chance in the lowest depths of hades this thing is ever gonna pass. They're nowhere close to the 2/3s vote they need. One more example of trying to win by any means necessary from the freedom and democracy loving right.Bill Frist, has opted to trash Senate procedure and bypass proper consideration in the Judiciary Committee to revive the Bush amendment, deservedly moribund for months.It is expected to come up barely a week before the Democratic presidential convention, perfect timing, as Bush partisans read their calendar, for pandering anew to their right-wing base.
posted
10:07 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Of course it does, which is why nine members of the House have asked the UN to provide them. What's the GOP afraid they might see?
Why Is The Right Wing Howling?
Does US Election Require International Watchdogs?Of course it does, which is why nine members of the House have asked the UN to provide them. What's the GOP afraid they might see?
posted
9:07 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
So how have right wingers been able to sell such obvious bullshit to so many Americans? Well, somebody explain to me the deafening silence in the mainstream media regarding powerful evidence that single payer is the most efficient, most effective, and most humane system that we know of. If you'd like to know more about single payer, this is an excellent series of articles that are an exception to the media blackout. But the Chronicle may be the most liberal paper in the US.
Health care is broken David Lazarus
Universal Ignorance On Healthcare
The right wing is always trying to argue that single payer universal healthcare will be a total disaster. Oh, they say, you ask anyone from Canada. Yeah, well, I've done that. The few Canadians I talked to loved it. Every Western industrialized democracy except the US has universal care, and none of them are taking steps to eliminate it. Isn't that odd? Illogical, ya might say.So how have right wingers been able to sell such obvious bullshit to so many Americans? Well, somebody explain to me the deafening silence in the mainstream media regarding powerful evidence that single payer is the most efficient, most effective, and most humane system that we know of. If you'd like to know more about single payer, this is an excellent series of articles that are an exception to the media blackout. But the Chronicle may be the most liberal paper in the US.
Health care is broken David Lazarus
posted
7:55 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Yeah, count me among the "paranoid" too. I just have a sneaky suspicion that the same anti-democratic thugs who did all that and more might, mind you, might try to rig the whole election through computer voting machines built, sold, and maintained by companies with close ties to the criminal conspiracy known as the GOP, machines that lack a paper trail or any other good means to conduct a recount.
Here's my rule on paranoia: You ain't paranoid if they're really out to get you.
The "Good News"
TCF reports:According to hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons, Will Smith held a voter registration event in his hometown of Philly and signed up 25,000 new voter. Puffy did the same in NY, and signed up 80,000. I'll see what info I can find, but let's spread this kind of news, too!Yeah, that's nice and all, but in the 2000 election 2 million ballots were declared spoiled. Half of those ballots were cast by black voters. Does anyone seriously think that was an oops? And the many thousands of eligible voters wrongly purged from the rolls as felons in Florida? Oh, it probably only happened in Florida. And the criminal jamming of phonelines set up to offer Democratic voters rides to the polls in New Hampshire? All just big oopses, all isolated cases.
Yeah, count me among the "paranoid" too. I just have a sneaky suspicion that the same anti-democratic thugs who did all that and more might, mind you, might try to rig the whole election through computer voting machines built, sold, and maintained by companies with close ties to the criminal conspiracy known as the GOP, machines that lack a paper trail or any other good means to conduct a recount.
Here's my rule on paranoia: You ain't paranoid if they're really out to get you.
posted
6:20 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Note the direct physical connection between Hussein and known GOP thug Donald "Rumfuck" Rumsfeld. It demonstrates an inarguable link between Hussein and the terrorist American right wing.
Hey, it makes as much sense as BushCo's claims of Iraq - Al-Qaeda links.
Proof Of Saddam-GOP Links!
At last we have proof of the GOPs complicity in the 9/11 attacks!
Note the direct physical connection between Hussein and known GOP thug Donald "Rumfuck" Rumsfeld. It demonstrates an inarguable link between Hussein and the terrorist American right wing.
Hey, it makes as much sense as BushCo's claims of Iraq - Al-Qaeda links.
posted
5:58 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
There's actually a chance the California Legislature could pass a bill establishing single payer. The gist of this post is that no major news media have covered this, not even the "liberal" San Francisco Chronicle or the "liberal" Los Angeles Times. It's not as if this is an isolated event. The "liberal" media that gave Bush an easy ride to war in Iraq is not liberal at all.
I have been called upon, essentially, to moderate my positions and not engage in righteous indignation which, I'm told, the Freepers are good at. Present the positive news, show all sides, all that nonsense. I have no intention of doing so. There is no "positive" news. The right began a political war 30 years ago and they have used any and all means to win since then. Lies, vote fixing, anti-democratic dirty tricks, news "management," whatever means "necessary." The moderate left undertook a measured response and appealed to reason. For many years so did I.
That response has gotten our butts kicked for the last 24 years at least. Now the right wing has reduced the hope for real democracy to less than a dream, to little more than a faint glimmer of what could have been. I will moderate when (and if) the main stream right moderates and not one second sooner. The right started the damn war. It's time to stop blaming those on the left who are merely defending themselves and what shreds of democracy are remain.
What Damn Liberal Media?
The Media Blackout: Single Payer HealthcareThere's actually a chance the California Legislature could pass a bill establishing single payer. The gist of this post is that no major news media have covered this, not even the "liberal" San Francisco Chronicle or the "liberal" Los Angeles Times. It's not as if this is an isolated event. The "liberal" media that gave Bush an easy ride to war in Iraq is not liberal at all.
I have been called upon, essentially, to moderate my positions and not engage in righteous indignation which, I'm told, the Freepers are good at. Present the positive news, show all sides, all that nonsense. I have no intention of doing so. There is no "positive" news. The right began a political war 30 years ago and they have used any and all means to win since then. Lies, vote fixing, anti-democratic dirty tricks, news "management," whatever means "necessary." The moderate left undertook a measured response and appealed to reason. For many years so did I.
That response has gotten our butts kicked for the last 24 years at least. Now the right wing has reduced the hope for real democracy to less than a dream, to little more than a faint glimmer of what could have been. I will moderate when (and if) the main stream right moderates and not one second sooner. The right started the damn war. It's time to stop blaming those on the left who are merely defending themselves and what shreds of democracy are remain.
posted
5:04 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 02, 2004
That said, right wingers, and especially those who are actual conservatives, are welcome, even encouraged to comment here. I don't even really mind if you call me names, but there are some hard and fast rules: you have to be able to construct a somewhat cogent argument, and back any assertions with evidence. No mere gainsaying or mere name calling allowed. No putting words in my mouth so you can knock down a strawman. You don't like my rules? Get yer own fuckin' blog.
July 02, 2004
One Pig Cut From The Choir
VOT has been banned from the comments. Of course, he accused me of censorship when I threatened to do so, to which I say, "Goddamn right." I've got every right to censor my own blog. It's mine, I own it. You can't come into my home and spew racist, Social Darwinist, and fascist bullshit. You can't do it on my blog either, unless for some odd reason I decide to let you.That said, right wingers, and especially those who are actual conservatives, are welcome, even encouraged to comment here. I don't even really mind if you call me names, but there are some hard and fast rules: you have to be able to construct a somewhat cogent argument, and back any assertions with evidence. No mere gainsaying or mere name calling allowed. No putting words in my mouth so you can knock down a strawman. You don't like my rules? Get yer own fuckin' blog.
posted
1:48 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
ONE MILLION BLACK VOTES DIDN'T COUNT IN THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
IT'S NOT TOO HARD TO GET YOUR VOTE LOST -- IF SOME POLITICIANS WANT IT TO BE LOST
Now you know damn well that Democrats ain't looking to disqualify black votes. That only leaves one democracy loving party.
Freedom Loving Right Wingers
The Miami Herald has a story today, Thousands of eligible voters are on felon list. Dave Anderson at In Search of Utopia has asked all bloggers to link or trackback to him on this story. We have to stop the deliberate disenfranchisement of black voters, and any voters, this election. In 2000, many people in Florida who were purged from the rolls weren't even felons, they just had names similar to felons. People should also read this about the 2000 election:ONE MILLION BLACK VOTES DIDN'T COUNT IN THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
IT'S NOT TOO HARD TO GET YOUR VOTE LOST -- IF SOME POLITICIANS WANT IT TO BE LOST
Now you know damn well that Democrats ain't looking to disqualify black votes. That only leaves one democracy loving party.
posted
1:11 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
The New Totalitarians
Net Politik links to this piece in the Nation:The increasing power of the state and the declining power of institutions intended to control it has been in the making for some time. The party system is a notorious example. The Republicans have emerged as a unique phenomenon in American history of a fervently doctrinal party, zealous, ruthless, antidemocratic and boasting a near majority. As Republicans have become more ideologically intolerant, the Democrats have shrugged off the liberal label and their critical reform-minded constituencies to embrace centrism and footnote the end of ideology. In ceasing to be a genuine opposition party the Democrats have smoothed the road to power of a party more than eager to use it to promote empire abroad and corporate power at home. Bear in mind that a ruthless, ideologically driven party with a mass base was a crucial element in all of the twentieth-century regimes seeking total power.Yup. Every bit of it. And I'm still trying to wield my miniscule power on behalf of saving government by the people from the half-wit, right wing, totalitarian trolls. I'm not even mentioning VOT. Oops, yes I am.
posted
10:03 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Thanks to In Search of Utopia for the tip.
An Invitation To Digital Brownshirts?
From Crooked Timber:This is for real. I’ve just spoken to a representative of Focus on the Family who has confirmed that Focus on the Family did, indeed, give out Moore’s home address. The person that I spoke to didn’t want to be quoted. I’ve asked the media relations department to see if they have any comment that they are willing to make, and I’ll update with any comment that they have.But liberals are being uncivil.
Thanks to In Search of Utopia for the tip.
posted
9:50 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
The Acumen Of Luskin The Krugman Stalker
Brad DeLong makes it pretty obvious that Donald Luskin isn't even close to being an economist, though he claims to be. Fun meaningless chart included.
posted
9:12 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
UPDATE: I went through my last 100 visits and found that this asshole has spent more than five hours and twenty minutes on my site in the last 58 hours. Apparently, he thinks I actually matter. If he really thinks I'm a moron, why bother? In all that time he's found no more than a handful of points to cherry pick, and he must've thought those were the real low-hanging fruit. Yet he still fucks it up. Amazing.
By-de-by, fuck-wit, phobias are by definition irrational. You've really got to stop using multisyllablic words, pig. You have a monosyllabic mind.
Might Be Time To Slaughter This Pig
VOT is startin' to get on my last nerve. He writes:Simply put the genocide in that part of the world is being carried out by the establishment arab/muslims against subsaharan christians and animists.I reply:
Which part of that statement do you find false. Answer, none. It is a Fact
BTW, Islamophobia is RATIONAL, how do explain 3000+ Americans killed, Turks killed, bangladeshis killed (for daring to watch bollywood films on ramadan), Israelis killed, Hindus killed, Australians killed, women beaten to death for the crime of being a rape victim, heads cut off of poor people seeking work all in the name of Dar-al-Islam (for you Phaedrus, the idiotic Janitor, transliterate that as "the rule of Islam [which means submission not "Peace"])
Of course that statement is factual. Point to where I said it wasn't. Tell me, genius, do you have even a nodding aquaintance with reason? If so, why are you always accusing me of saying things I didn't say?I'm curious what readers think. I'm sure you're soon going to find these exchanges tiresome, if you don't already. I don't feel like trying to teach this pig to sing anymore. Should I ban this half-wit sumbitch, or let him continue to comment though I plan to ignore him?
Fact: Some Muslims do awful things. Fact: Some Christians do awful things. Fact: Some humans belonging to any faith do awful things. Therefore, by your reasoning, people of faith are scum.
I'm not a fan of religion or faith, but I wouldn't go that far. You whine that "childish leftists" like me have the temerity to accuse irrational rightists like you of Islamophobia, then you proclaim that Islamophobia is rational. So, if we do call you Islamophobic, aren't we just stating facts? About you, anyway.
BTW, I love the way you talk down to me because I was once a janitor. When I was a janitor, I got paid about $16.50 an hour, in todays dollars, with excellent benefits. I had been head receiver in a warehouse, supervising other employees. The janitorial job paid more than the warehouse manager was getting, with much better benefits.
Tell me, genius, is everyone who makes less than $16.50 an hour today an idiot in your estimation? That would take in a whole lot of territory.
I don't know why I bother to reply. I know you cherry pick the points you respond to and, even so, you wind up screwin' the pooch in public. I might have to start calling you Santorum. You're either going to have to get a lot more rational or a lot more fun, and I mean right away, or your gone.
I don't mind being insulted personally. I figure tit for tat, ya know. But when you insult me for having been a janitor, you insult an entire class, a class of people who, most of them, are far better human beings than yourself. That's evil, pig. You're evil. Given the chance, you'd behave every bit as horribly as the Muslims you abhor. It's obviously part of your cowardly nature.
I have very little patience with irrational people, and even less with evil ones. I believe you've about worn mine out. Not because you insult me, but because you appear to be incapable of arguing honestly or rationally. In fact, I'd be happier if you'd just fuck off and die, pig. Oh, I almost forgot. You mean tranlate, genius, not transliterate. You could look it up. If you know how. You hadn't oughta use words you don't understand.
UPDATE: I went through my last 100 visits and found that this asshole has spent more than five hours and twenty minutes on my site in the last 58 hours. Apparently, he thinks I actually matter. If he really thinks I'm a moron, why bother? In all that time he's found no more than a handful of points to cherry pick, and he must've thought those were the real low-hanging fruit. Yet he still fucks it up. Amazing.
By-de-by, fuck-wit, phobias are by definition irrational. You've really got to stop using multisyllablic words, pig. You have a monosyllabic mind.
posted
5:58 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
July 01, 2004
July 01, 2004
My New Most Favoritest Right Winger
VOT dropped by again for a friendly chat about maturity. Or something.I would love for the international community to step in and stop the genocide in the Sudan, but the problem is if the U.S. did it they would be accused by childish leftists like you of being "racist" and "islamophobic". Simply put the genocide in that part of the world is being carried out by the establishment arab/muslims against subsaharan christians and animists. This is the future of Europe, America, Russia, and Asia unless we either forcibly integrate the muslim waste or stop them from immigratingI replied:
Curses! You've discovered my clever trap. I'm trying to get people to call government officials and urge them to get the US to intervene in Sudan so that, when they do, I can call them racist and and islamaphobic.
"the muslim waste"
Hmm. Is that just a teeny bit of Islamophobia you got goin' on there? Or are you saying they're less than human?
Oh, and childishness? Hell, what I've always loved best about far right whackadoodles is their maturity. Sure, they're astonishingly ignorant and illogical but, boy howdy, are they ever mature.
Ya know, my granpap always tol' me, "Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig." But I just can't seem to resist the temptation. Thanks for the entertainment, pig.
posted
8:02 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
I'm Attacked by the New York Times!
Corn Devastates Kristof's Column
In part by pointing out that Kristof is pretending he doesn't know the dictionary definition of lying. Maybe he doesn't. It's not as though he's a professional writer. Actually, he does, but he claims to think it's just more persuasive to call a spade a shovel. Or an airplane. Anything but a spade. Or maybe he's just self-deluded, like Bush. David Corn believes in plain speaking.I'm Attacked by the New York Times!
posted
7:33 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Think Again: Michael Moore, Cause for War?
They only found 237 willfully misleading statements. I love all the euphemism. It's so awful to call the President a liar. Ya know, 'less he's a Democrat. Kristof, and if we could see him I'm sure he'd have a straight face, says that Bush didn't lie about Iraq. He only exaggerated. See, if I call a woman up to try to get a blind date and I tell her I'm 6'5" tall and bear a striking resemblance to a young Warren Beatty, I'm just exaggerating. Course, I'm also lying my ass off! But I'm not the President. Thousands have died for Bush's lies.
So the press is all over Moore's awful dishonesty now, but they gave BushCo a virtual free pass on the Iraq war. Only a conspiracy theorist would find that the least bit suspicious.
How Many Will Die For Moore's "Lies?"
The media has been all over Michael Moore like stink on shit. Eric Alterman wonders why they didn't critique Bush's case for war with the same vigor. So should we all.Think Again: Michael Moore, Cause for War?
The media, apparently, have finally decided to take a stand for truth in reporting. Their target? Alleged America-hater Michael Moore and his apparently epoch-making "Fahrenheit 9/11." His film turns out to be of such critical importance to the Fate of the Republic that journalists have spared no trite observation in parsing every shot of the film for accuracy.Alterman's piece includes this link to a report by the UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM — MINORITY STAFF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION, IRAQ ON THE RECORD, THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON IRAQ.
[snip]
Comparing the sly tricks with the truth that Moore uses in his film with the damage the Bush administration has caused in conning the nation to go to war ought obviously to be an absurd proposition. Indeed, if the president's speeches to the nation about his decision to go to war had received a significant fraction of the journalistic attention that Moore's film has, it's a good bet 5,600 American soldiers would sill be enjoying their release from the military—rather than being called back to duty to carry out an increasingly chaotic and counterproductive occupation. Not only did the administration get away with inflating the level of military threat Iraq presented both to the world and to the United States, it also concocted evidence tying it to global terrorism, while simultaneously minimizing both the cost and the difficulty of the ensuing military occupation. In the end, almost every piece of evidence the administration put forth in support of its war could be called into question, both before the war, and after.
They only found 237 willfully misleading statements. I love all the euphemism. It's so awful to call the President a liar. Ya know, 'less he's a Democrat. Kristof, and if we could see him I'm sure he'd have a straight face, says that Bush didn't lie about Iraq. He only exaggerated. See, if I call a woman up to try to get a blind date and I tell her I'm 6'5" tall and bear a striking resemblance to a young Warren Beatty, I'm just exaggerating. Course, I'm also lying my ass off! But I'm not the President. Thousands have died for Bush's lies.
So the press is all over Moore's awful dishonesty now, but they gave BushCo a virtual free pass on the Iraq war. Only a conspiracy theorist would find that the least bit suspicious.
posted
4:30 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
From The Contradictions of Cultural Conservatism in the Assault on American Colleges:
Another Right Wing Lie?
We've all heard it. Liberal academia, liberal academia, liberal academia. Kinda like, liberal media, liberal media, liberal media. Advertising slogans designed to convince the gullible that something is true without having to resort to actual facts. Ya know how them facts are. They's kinda inconvenient.From The Contradictions of Cultural Conservatism in the Assault on American Colleges:
Conservative surveys purporting to show that most faculty members describe themselves as Democrats (which is not necessarily equated with liberals, and certainly not leftists) are skewed by excluding faculties other than those in liberal education.Man, I'd love to have documentation of this. In the absence of it all I can say is it sure sounds like a typical, right wing, thinktank sort of lie. This is an interesting piece, and it touches on an issue I mentioned in my previous post, the right's declaration of political war.
Horowitz himself, in The Art of Political War (2000), offers advice to conservative politicians that could have come out of Mein Kampf: "When you speak, do not forget that a sound bite is all you have. Whatever you have to say, make sure to say it loud and clear. Keep it simple and keep it short -- a slogan is always better. ... With these audiences, you will never have time for real arguments or proper analyses. Images -- symbols and sound bites -- will always prevail. Therefore, it is absolutely essential to focus your message and repeat it over and over again."I wonder why so many "liberal" commentators focus so aciduously on Michael Moore not presenting all sides, but seem to think the facts that the right always presents only one (highly distorted) side and the Bush Admin only presents one (highly distorted) side are hardly worth mentioning?
posted
3:19 PM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
Tell me, is it fair and balanced to compare Moore to Rush Limbaugh? Al Franken to Bill O'Leilly? Ann Coulter's "Treason," to Jim Hightower's "Thieves In High Places," as Ellen Goodman does? I'll acknowledge that all these people are polemicists, but they have little else in common. Is it balance to compare a devoted minister who fibs about taking a little nip on Friday night to a career con man who makes a handsome living defrauding the elderly? Limbaugh, O'Leilly, and Coulter are all shameless, serial liars whose intent is wholesale deception.
The "moderate liberals" all seem to say that they want to return to the good old days of reasoned debate. Well, I would too, believe it or lump it, but here's the real deal. The right wing started a political war more than 30 years ago, and their intent was to win by any means necessary. They took their own sweet time about declaring the war, but it was even openly declared years ago. Liberals have tried to respond with reasoned debate, they have tried to remain above the fray, tried not to dirty their hands, and as a direct result we've been getting our asses kicked for 30 years.
The right has even managed to turn liberal into a dirty word, despite the fact that the majority of Americans are closer to liberals than right wingers on most of the major issues. They did it with vituperation and lies and by pretending to be what they're not. I don't think we should lie and I don't think we should pretend to be what we're not. But the right started this political war, and the right chose its ugly weapons.
Now, we have only two choices. To meet the right on the battlefield, not in polite debate, with powerful polemics. Or let the America we all love turn into a right wing hell hole. If, like the "moderate liberals," you're too prissy to get your hands dirty, then you might as well declare your political pacifism, because you're not worth a damn to anyone in this fight, especially not those who most need your help.
Who knows? Maybe if we each tell our own side, and somebody busts the egregious lies, the people will be able to figure it out for themselves. Everyone who has even the slightest chance of making a political difference in this era is a polemicist. The left didn't choose that paradigm, but we can't change it either. Never bring a knife to a gunfight.
"Moderate Liberals" Still Don't Get It
I'm not sure why "moderate liberal" commentators feel such an overwhelming need to criticize Michael Moore. If I were inclined to give in to my darkest suspicions I could probably lay out a theory or two, but the truth is I don't really know. Maybe they feel the need to appear "balanced."Tell me, is it fair and balanced to compare Moore to Rush Limbaugh? Al Franken to Bill O'Leilly? Ann Coulter's "Treason," to Jim Hightower's "Thieves In High Places," as Ellen Goodman does? I'll acknowledge that all these people are polemicists, but they have little else in common. Is it balance to compare a devoted minister who fibs about taking a little nip on Friday night to a career con man who makes a handsome living defrauding the elderly? Limbaugh, O'Leilly, and Coulter are all shameless, serial liars whose intent is wholesale deception.
The "moderate liberals" all seem to say that they want to return to the good old days of reasoned debate. Well, I would too, believe it or lump it, but here's the real deal. The right wing started a political war more than 30 years ago, and their intent was to win by any means necessary. They took their own sweet time about declaring the war, but it was even openly declared years ago. Liberals have tried to respond with reasoned debate, they have tried to remain above the fray, tried not to dirty their hands, and as a direct result we've been getting our asses kicked for 30 years.
The right has even managed to turn liberal into a dirty word, despite the fact that the majority of Americans are closer to liberals than right wingers on most of the major issues. They did it with vituperation and lies and by pretending to be what they're not. I don't think we should lie and I don't think we should pretend to be what we're not. But the right started this political war, and the right chose its ugly weapons.
Now, we have only two choices. To meet the right on the battlefield, not in polite debate, with powerful polemics. Or let the America we all love turn into a right wing hell hole. If, like the "moderate liberals," you're too prissy to get your hands dirty, then you might as well declare your political pacifism, because you're not worth a damn to anyone in this fight, especially not those who most need your help.
Who knows? Maybe if we each tell our own side, and somebody busts the egregious lies, the people will be able to figure it out for themselves. Everyone who has even the slightest chance of making a political difference in this era is a polemicist. The left didn't choose that paradigm, but we can't change it either. Never bring a knife to a gunfight.
posted
11:28 AM by
Phaedrus | Link |
|
GOP Wages Political War - By Any Means
Former head of GOP consulting group pleads guilty to jamming Democratic phone linesCONCORD, N.H. (AP) The former head of a Republican consulting group has pleaded guilty to jamming Democratic telephone lines in several New Hampshire cities during the 2002 general election.The major players in and behind the GOP don't care about democracy at all. They only care about jamming their agenda down the voters throats.
Allen Raymond, former president of the Alexandria, Va.-based GOP Marketplace LLC, waived indictment and pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Concord on Wednesday. Judge Joseph A. DiClerico Jr. released Raymond on his own recognizance pending sentencing in November.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department, which prosecuted the case, said an investigation into the telephone jamming continues.
According to court papers, Raymond plotted with unidentified co-conspirators to jam Democratic Party telephone lines established so voters could call for rides to the polls in Manchester, Nashua, Rochester and Claremont. Manchester firefighters' union phone lines also were affected.
|
From the Trenches but it's a good blog anyway. 
Contribute Here. Give Early, Give Often. Sign Columbine father's petition to extend the assault weapons ban. 
Help California's homeless mentally ill. Help yourself. Search this site Use Edit|Find to scan page. My Manifesto "For Progressives: What We're Gonna Do" A blueprint for progress while confined to a two-party system. Fat Poppa's (Phaedrus') Political Ditties (mp3s) Me on the harp and vocals "We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." "There is no way for a citizen of the Republic to abdicate his responsibility." Edward R. Murrow "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are Conservatives." John Stuart Mill And if ya listen ta Rush Dimbulb . . . . 
Archives
The Samizdata Credits design by maystar powered by blogger Atom XML/RSS Site Feed 
help?
c'mon, li'l help 
Search4Blogs The Me What I Am I took the name Phaedrus from Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Not that I'm as smart as that Phaedrus, but I am a ghost. Sort of. I started doing odd jobs at a motel when I was 14. I lasted one day at a McDonald's, quit, lasted a lot longer at Taco Bell. I've been a gas station attendant, janitor, die cast production worker, day laborer, course maintenance at a miniature golf course, warehouse, union janitor, cabbie, statistical clerk, pool cleaner, working homeless for a few weeks (day labor), and several other things I can't remember. And I've survived. Sort of. I'm not a Marxist, but I am a genuine member of the lumpen proletariat. Largely paraphrasing the secular saint Woody Guthrie: "This shit is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright # 000000 (cuz this part's not true), for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught using it without my permission, will be considered mighty good friends o' mine, cause I don't give a dern. Publish it. Twist it. Rewrite it. Swing to it. I wrote it, that's all I wanted to do."  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |